Oyebola D D, Adewoye O E, Iyaniwura J O, Alada A R, Fasanmade A A, Raji Y
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2000 Sep-Dec;29(3-4):201-5.
This study was designed to compare the performance of medical students in physiology when assessed by multiple choice questions (MCQs) and short essay questions (SEQs). The study also examined the influence of factors such as age, sex, O/level grades and JAMB scores on performance in the MCQs and SEQs. A structured questionnaire was administered to 264 medical students' four months before the Part I MBBS examination. Apart from personal data of each student, the questionnaire sought information on the JAMB scores and GCE O' Level grades of each student in English Language, Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Mathematics. The physiology syllabus was divided into five parts and the students were administered separate examinations (tests) on each part. Each test consisted of MCQs and SEQs. The performance in MCQs and SEQs were compared. Also, the effects of JAMB scores and GCE O/level grades on the performance in both the MCQs and SEQs were assessed. The results showed that the students performed better in all MCQ tests than in the SEQs. JAMB scores and O' level English Language grade had no significant effect on students' performance in MCQs and SEQs. However O' level grades in Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Mathematics had significant effects on performance in MCQs and SEQs. Inadequate knowledge of physiology and inability to present information in a logical sequence are believed to be major factors contributing to the poorer performance in the SEQs compared with MCQs. In view of the finding of significant association between performance in MCQs and SEQs and GCE O/level grades in science subjects and mathematics, it was recommended that both JAMB results and the GCE results in the four O/level subjects above may be considered when selecting candidates for admission into the medical schools.
本研究旨在比较医学生在生理学考试中,采用多项选择题(MCQs)和短文简答题(SEQs)进行评估时的表现。该研究还考察了年龄、性别、普通中等教育证书(O/level)成绩和联合招生考试(JAMB)分数等因素对MCQs和SEQs成绩的影响。在医学学士第一部分考试前四个月,对264名医学生进行了结构化问卷调查。除了每个学生的个人数据外,问卷还收集了每个学生在英语、生物、化学、物理和数学方面的JAMB分数和普通中等教育证书O/level成绩。生理学教学大纲分为五个部分,对学生在每个部分分别进行考试(测试)。每次测试都包括MCQs和SEQs。比较了MCQs和SEQs的成绩。此外,还评估了JAMB分数和普通中等教育证书O/level成绩对MCQs和SEQs成绩的影响。结果表明,学生在所有MCQ测试中的表现都优于SEQs。JAMB分数和O/level英语成绩对学生在MCQs和SEQs中的表现没有显著影响。然而,生物、化学、物理和数学的O/level成绩对MCQs和SEQs的成绩有显著影响。生理学知识不足以及无法按逻辑顺序呈现信息被认为是导致与MCQs相比,SEQs成绩较差的主要因素。鉴于MCQs和SEQs成绩与科学科目和数学的普通中等教育证书O/level成绩之间存在显著关联,建议在选拔医学院校的录取候选人时,同时考虑JAMB成绩和上述四个O/level科目的普通中等教育证书成绩。