Suppr超能文献

使用国际原子能机构(IAEA)和英国健康保护局(HPA)协议对钴-60治疗束中水体吸收剂量进行的相互比较。

Inter-comparison of absorbed dose to water in a Co-60 therapy beam using IAEA and HPA protocols.

作者信息

Farai I P, Kadni T

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

出版信息

Afr J Med Med Sci. 2000 Sep-Dec;29(3-4):219-21.

Abstract

The absorbed dose water in a Co-60 teletherapy beam has been measured with four different standard ionisation chambers applying two codes of practice and also, with a Fricke dosimeter. Measured values agree generally within 2.3%. There is a remarkable agreement of less than 0.3% variation, between ionisation chambers NE 2561 and NE 2481 when the IAEA protocol is applied. The HPA protocol is applicable to only NE 2561 and a variation of about 1.4% was observed between measurements made with this ionisation chamber applying the two protocols. The IAEA protocol shows very accurate results. With a deviation of about 2.2%, the Frickle dosimeter appears to be the least accurate for therapy dose measurement despite its simplicity of application.

摘要

使用四个不同的标准电离室,应用两种操作规范,还使用弗里克剂量计,对钴 - 60远距离治疗束中的吸收剂量水进行了测量。测量值总体上在2.3%以内相符。当应用国际原子能机构(IAEA)的协议时,电离室NE 2561和NE 2481之间的变化小于0.3%,存在显著的一致性。健康保护局(HPA)的协议仅适用于NE 2561,使用该电离室应用这两种协议进行测量时,观察到约1.4%的变化。IAEA协议显示出非常准确的结果。尽管弗里克剂量计应用简单,但对于治疗剂量测量来说,其偏差约为2.2%,似乎是最不准确的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验