Godin G, Gagnon H, Alary M, Noël L, Morissette M R
Laval University Research Group on Behavior in the Field of Health, Faculty of Nursing, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
AIDS Educ Prev. 2001 Oct;13(5):462-73. doi: 10.1521/aeap.13.5.462.24145.
The aim of this study was to identify the factors which explain correctional officers' intention of accepting or refusing to make HIV preventive tools (condoms, bleach, tattooing equipment, and syringes) accessible to inmates. A total of 957 officers completed a questionnaire that took into account determinants from several social-cognitive behavior theories. The results indicated that only 21.4% of officers were favorable toward making accessible all of the preventive tools. The theoretical model explained 87% of the intention variance, p < .0001. Self-efficacy (beta = .35), personal normative belief (beta = .29), social determinants (beta = .21) and the affective dimension of attitude (beta = .19) were significant determinants. Moreover, officers with a high level of intention differed from those with a low level of intention on several points of the theoretical model. In conclusion, the results clearly indicated that several difficulties must be overcome before HIV preventive tools as a whole can be made accessible to inmates.
本研究的目的是确定那些能够解释惩教人员接受或拒绝让囚犯使用艾滋病毒预防工具(避孕套、漂白剂、纹身设备和注射器)意图的因素。共有957名惩教人员完成了一份问卷,该问卷考虑了几种社会认知行为理论中的决定因素。结果表明,只有21.4%的惩教人员赞成提供所有预防工具。理论模型解释了87%的意图差异,p <.0001。自我效能感(β =.35)、个人规范信念(β =.29)、社会决定因素(β =.21)和态度的情感维度(β =.19)是显著的决定因素。此外,在理论模型的几个方面,高意图水平的惩教人员与低意图水平的惩教人员存在差异。总之,结果清楚地表明,在让囚犯能够全面使用艾滋病毒预防工具之前,必须克服几个困难。