Suppr超能文献

First do no harm: extending the debate on the provision of preventive tamoxifen.

作者信息

Will B P, Nobrega K M, Berthelot J M, Flanagan W, Wolfson M C, Logan D M, Evans W K

机构信息

The Health Analysis and Modeling Group, Statistics Canada, 24-Q, R.H. Coats Building, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0T6, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2001 Nov 2;85(9):1280-8. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2125.

Abstract

The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT-P-1) demonstrated that tamoxifen could reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer in high-risk women by 49%, but that it could also increase the risk of endometrial cancer, vascular events and cataracts. This paper provides an estimate of the net health impacts of tamoxifen administration on high-risk Canadian women with no prior history of breast cancer. The results of the BCPT-P-1 were incorporated into the breast cancer and other modules of Statistics Canada's microsimulation POpulation HEalth Model (POHEM). While the main intervention scenario conformed as closely as possible to the eligibility criteria for tamoxifen in the BCPT-P-1 protocol, 3 additional scenarios were simulated. Predicted absolute risks of breast cancer at 5 years of 1.66%, 3.32% and 4.15% were calculated for women 35 to 70 years of age. When the BCPT-P-1 results were incorporated into the simulation model, the analysis suggests no increase in life expectancy in this risk group. Tamoxifen appeared to be beneficial for women with a 5-year predicted risk of 3.32% or greater. The results of these simulations are particularly sensitive to the reduction in mortality observed in the BCPT-P-1, as well as being sensitive to other characteristics of the simulation model. Overall, the analysis raises questions about the use of tamoxifen in otherwise healthy women at high risk of breast cancer.

摘要

相似文献

1
First do no harm: extending the debate on the provision of preventive tamoxifen.
Br J Cancer. 2001 Nov 2;85(9):1280-8. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2125.
4
Follow-up of the breast cancer prevention trial and the future of breast cancer prevention efforts.
Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Dec;7(12 Suppl):4413s-4418s; discussion 4411s-4412s.
5
Chemoprevention: drug pricing and mortality: the case of tamoxifen.
Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;107(5):950-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22075.
9
Tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer and risk of endometrial cancer: a case-control study.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):375-84. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji057.

引用本文的文献

1
The Population Health Model (POHEM): an overview of rationale, methods and applications.
Popul Health Metr. 2015 Sep 3;13:24. doi: 10.1186/s12963-015-0057-x. eCollection 2015.
2
Validation of population-based disease simulation models: a review of concepts and methods.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Nov 18;10:710. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-710.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer: better care for less cost. Is it possible?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Autumn;16(4):1168-78. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300103204.
3
What makes clinical research ethical?
JAMA. 2000;283(20):2701-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701.
4
Re: tamoxifen prevention of breast cancer: an instance of the fingerpost.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Apr 19;92(8):659-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.8.659.
6
Estimates of the lifetime costs of breast cancer treatment in Canada.
Eur J Cancer. 2000 Apr;36(6):724-35. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00340-8.
7
Tamoxifen should be cost-effective in reducing breast cancer risk in high-risk women.
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(2):284-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.2.284.
8
Estimation of tamoxifen's efficacy for preventing the formation and growth of breast tumors.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jan 5;92(1):48-53. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.1.48.
10
Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Nov 3;91(21):1829-46. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.21.1829.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验