Haulik L, Tóth B, Issekutz A, Gartner B
Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház, Sebészeti Osztály, Gyór, 9002 Gyór, Pf. 92.
Magy Seb. 2001 Oct;54(5):309-13.
Pancreatic trauma is relatively uncommon, but it has high morbidity and mortality rates, especially when the diagnosis is delayed or inappropriate surgery is attempted. We analysed the management of 11 patients in a university teaching hospital treated with distal pancreatic transsection without (grade II--according AAST score) and with main pancreatic duct (MPD) injury (grade III) caused by blunt abdominal trauma. The average age of the 10 male and 1 female patients was 24.9 years (5-56). Five patients had isolated pancreatic trauma, other 6 patients had 2.3 associated intraabdominal and 0.8 associated extraabdominal injuries. Six patients were diagnosed and operated within the first 24 hours. Five of them had transsection of the gland with main pancreatic duct injury, distal pancreatectomy with (2) or without (1) splenectomy, distal pancreatogastrostomy (1), and (due to associated duodenal laceration) pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (1) were performed. In one case (grade II) only external drainage was necessary. All patients in this group who were operated on early survived. Only one patient needed reoperation due to haemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. From the other five patients four were referred after initial treatment in a primary centre (all of them underwent some kind of external drainage), and in one patient the diagnosis of pancreatic injury was missed at the initial operation in our hospital. Three of them had undetected MPD injury, in two patients parenchymal lesions were underestimated or missed. Every patients needed subsequent resection (1), internal drainage due to fistula (2), or drainage of developed abscess (2). Three of them had severe septic and pulmonary complications; one patient with MPD injury died. Patients who require delayed surgery after an unsuccessful period of conservative treatment or a subsequent operation due to undetected MPD injury demonstrated higher pancreas-specific mortality and morbidity rate.
胰腺创伤相对少见,但发病率和死亡率很高,尤其是诊断延迟或尝试进行不恰当手术时。我们分析了一家大学教学医院中11例因钝性腹部创伤导致胰腺远端横断(根据美国创伤外科学会[AAST]评分属于Ⅱ级)且伴有主胰管(MPD)损伤(Ⅲ级)患者的治疗情况。10例男性和1例女性患者的平均年龄为24.9岁(5 - 56岁)。5例患者为单纯胰腺创伤,另外6例患者合并2.3处腹腔内损伤和0.8处腹腔外损伤。6例患者在最初24小时内确诊并接受手术。其中5例为胰腺横断合并主胰管损伤,分别进行了保留脾脏(2例)或切除脾脏(1例)的远端胰腺切除术、远端胰胃吻合术(1例)以及(因合并十二指肠裂伤)保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术(1例)。1例(Ⅱ级)仅需进行外引流。该组所有早期接受手术的患者均存活。仅1例患者在胰十二指肠切除术后因出血需要再次手术。另外5例患者中,4例在基层医院接受初始治疗后转诊而来(他们均接受了某种形式的外引流),1例患者在我院初次手术时漏诊了胰腺损伤。其中3例未检测到主胰管损伤,2例患者的实质损伤被低估或漏诊。所有患者均需要后续切除手术(1例)、因瘘管进行内引流(2例)或对形成的脓肿进行引流(2例)。其中3例出现严重的感染和肺部并发症;1例主胰管损伤患者死亡。因保守治疗失败后需要延迟手术或因未检测到主胰管损伤而进行后续手术的患者,胰腺特异性死亡率和发病率更高。