Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死后早期同时给予阿司匹林和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂时,二者无相互作用:GISSI-3试验结果

Aspirin does not interact with ACE inhibitors when both are given early after acute myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-3 Trial.

作者信息

Latini R, Santoro E, Masson S, Tavazzi L, Maggioni A P, Franzosi M G, Barlera S, Calvillo L, Salio M, Staszewsky L, Labarta V, Tognoni G

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via Eritrea, 62 20157 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Heart Dis. 2000 May-Jun;2(3):185-90.

Abstract

Aspirin (ASA) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) therapy reduce mortality when administered early after the onset of myocardial infarction. ASA can antagonize some effects of ACEi therapy by inhibiting the synthesis of vasodilating prostaglandins; however, the evidence for this effect from large controlled trials is contradictory. The authors analyzed a database of 18,895 patients of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardio-3 (GISSI-3) Trial in which patients were allocated either to receive lisinopril or not to receive lisinopril within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction. The aim of the study was to verify the possible negative interaction between ASA and the ACEi lisinopril in the postacute phase of acute myocardial infarction. Of 18,895 analyzable patients, 15,841 received ASA at entry. Overall lisinopril reduced 42-day mortality from 7.1% to 6.3%. In patients receiving ASA, mortality was reduced by lisinopril from 6.0% to 5.4%, and from 13.0% to 10.8% in patients not receiving ASA. The difference in proportional reductions of mortality corresponds to the fact that a more marked lisinopril effect is seen in patients at higher baseline risk across all study subgroups, one of which coincides with the no-ASA group. The analysis of the inhospital incidence of major clinical events did not reveal a potentially negative interaction between ASA and lisinopril. The same findings were obtained from the analysis of reinfarction at 42 days. The interaction between ASA and lisinopril was also tested by multivariate analysis adjusted for confounding variables at entry, and the interaction tests were not statistically significant. Serum creatinine levels at 42 days were significantly higher in lisinopril group than in the control group. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures in lisinopril group were significantly lower than controls at 42 days. The effect of lisinopril on creatinine and blood pressure did not differ between the ASA and no-ASA groups. ASA does not decrease the mortality benefit of early lisinopril after myocardial infarction, nor does it increase the risk of major adverse events. Lisinopril is safe and effective when given early after the onset of myocardial infarction, regardless of a concomitant administration of ASA started early and continued over a 6-week period.

摘要

阿司匹林(ASA)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)治疗在心肌梗死发作后早期使用可降低死亡率。ASA可通过抑制血管舒张性前列腺素的合成来拮抗ACEi治疗的某些作用;然而,大型对照试验关于这种作用的证据相互矛盾。作者分析了意大利心肌梗死存活研究组-3(GISSI-3)试验的18895例患者的数据库,该试验中患者在心肌梗死症状发作后24小时内被分配接受赖诺普利或不接受赖诺普利。该研究的目的是验证ASA与ACEi赖诺普利在急性心肌梗死后急性期可能存在的负面相互作用。在18895例可分析患者中,15841例在入院时接受了ASA。总体而言,赖诺普利将42天死亡率从7.1%降至6.3%。在接受ASA的患者中,赖诺普利将死亡率从6.0%降至5.4%,在未接受ASA的患者中从13.0%降至10.8%。死亡率降低比例的差异对应于这样一个事实,即在所有研究亚组中,基线风险较高的患者中可见到更显著的赖诺普利效应,其中一个亚组与无ASA组一致。对主要临床事件的院内发生率分析未发现ASA与赖诺普利之间存在潜在的负面相互作用。对42天时再梗死的分析也得到了相同的结果。通过对入院时混杂变量进行校正的多变量分析也检验了ASA与赖诺普利之间的相互作用,且相互作用检验无统计学意义。赖诺普利组42天时的血清肌酐水平显著高于对照组。赖诺普利组42天时的收缩压和舒张压显著低于对照组。赖诺普利对肌酐和血压的作用在ASA组和无ASA组之间没有差异。ASA不会降低心肌梗死后早期使用赖诺普利的死亡率获益,也不会增加主要不良事件的风险。无论是否早期同时使用ASA并持续6周,心肌梗死发作后早期给予赖诺普利都是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验