Young J B
Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.
Cardiol Clin. 1995 Aug;13(3):379-90.
Results from SOLVD, SAVE, AIRE, GISSI-III, ISIS-IV, and the Chinese Captopril Trial suggest that therapy with ACE inhibitors, at least with enalapril, captopril, ramipril, and lisinopril, induce significant reduction in morbidity and mortality rates in patients with ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and a wide range of ventricular function and myocardial infarction. SOLVD and SAVE results, in particular, demonstrate improved survival and reduced major ischemic events in patients with depressed systolic ventricular function. SOLVD points out that institution of ACE inhibitor therapy need not be done immediately post-myocardial infarction to accrue benefit. GISSI-III and ISIS-IV, on the other hand, suggest that use of ACE inhibitor drugs early post-myocardial infarction produces significant, albeit small, benefits when drugs are begun early post-event in conjunction with other routinely used therapeutic strategies. The prospective, well-designed, and well-controlled nature of these clinical trials, the consistency of their findings, and the high level of morbidity and mortality in placebo groups establish the importance of preventing ischemic events with the prescribed ACE inhibitors. Particularly important is the fact that none of these clinical trials were designed to determine optimal dose or frequency of administration of the ACE inhibitors chosen. Targeting dose principles were utilized and clinicians wishing to generate similar results in their own patient population should choose one of the ACE inhibitors studied and administer it in the manner described in hopes of achieving outcomes similar to those detailed in the summarized clinical trials. Finally, recommendations regarding post-myocardial infarction therapy with ACE inhibitors can be summarized. Patients having acute or remote infarction should have an assessment of ventricular function. All patients with depressed systolic function, whether they are or are not symptomatic, should receive a trial of an appropriate ACE inhibitor. Patients suffering an acute myocardial infarction should have an assessment of ventricular function early and, if the ejection fraction is low (probably < 50%), an appropriately chosen ACE inhibitor should be begun after 24 hours have elapsed. ACE inhibitor therapy should be begun in combination with other proven effective post-myocardial infarction treatment strategies. In patients with normal systolic function, advantages of ACE inhibitor therapy are less clear, but patients with large anterior wall myocardial infarction will likely benefit, even without objective evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Concomitant utilization of thrombolytic agents, aspirin, and beta blockers should not interdict use of ACE inhibitor therapy.
SOLVD、SAVE、AIRE、GISSI - III、ISIS - IV以及中国卡托普利试验的结果表明,使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂进行治疗,至少使用依那普利、卡托普利、雷米普利和赖诺普利,可显著降低缺血性心脏病、心肌梗死患者以及各种心室功能和心肌梗死患者的发病率和死亡率。特别是SOLVD和SAVE的结果表明,收缩期心室功能不全的患者生存率提高,主要缺血事件减少。SOLVD指出,心肌梗死后不必立即开始ACE抑制剂治疗就能获益。另一方面,GISSI - III和ISIS - IV表明,心肌梗死后早期使用ACE抑制剂药物,在事件发生后早期与其他常规治疗策略联合使用时,会产生显著的益处,尽管益处较小。这些临床试验具有前瞻性、设计良好且控制严格的特点,其研究结果的一致性以及安慰剂组的高发病率和死亡率,确立了使用规定的ACE抑制剂预防缺血事件的重要性。特别重要的是,这些临床试验均未设计用于确定所选用的ACE抑制剂的最佳剂量或给药频率。采用了靶向剂量原则,希望在自己的患者群体中产生类似结果的临床医生应选择所研究的一种ACE抑制剂,并按照所描述的方式给药,以期获得与总结的临床试验中详细描述的结果相似的结果。最后,可以总结关于心肌梗死后使用ACE抑制剂治疗的建议。患有急性或陈旧性梗死的患者应评估心室功能。所有收缩功能不全的患者,无论有无症状,都应试用适当的ACE抑制剂。急性心肌梗死患者应尽早评估心室功能,如果射血分数较低(可能<50%),应在24小时后开始使用适当选择的ACE抑制剂。ACE抑制剂治疗应与其他已证实有效的心肌梗死后治疗策略联合开始。在收缩功能正常的患者中,ACE抑制剂治疗的优势尚不清楚,但大面积前壁心肌梗死的患者可能会受益,即使没有左心室收缩功能障碍的客观证据。同时使用溶栓剂、阿司匹林和β受体阻滞剂不应妨碍ACE抑制剂治疗的使用。