Kavak Z N, Başgül A, Ceyhan N
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Dec 10;100(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00417-1.
To compare general and spinal anesthesia with respect to the short-term outcome of newborns born by elective cesarean deliveries.
Pregnant women admitted to our hospital from January 1999 to July 2000, for whom elective repeat cesareans were planned after 37 weeks gestation, were allocated randomly after their informed consent to spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia. Maternal age, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar's score, hospital stay duration, and duration of cesarean section time were all noted. The rate of the neonatal respiratory depression, perinatal asphyxia, and admittance to the neonatal intensive care unit of the infants were documented. We also studied arterial samples withdrawn from the cord for the pH, bicarbonate, PaO(2) (oxygen pressure, arterial), and PaCO(2) (carbon dioxide pressure, arterial). The serum levels of creatine kinase with myocardial-specific isoform, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total cortisol levels of the newborns were measured and served in ruling out perinatal stress and in confirming the diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia (and of myocardial damage). Statistical analyses was performed with the use of an unpaired Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and a power calculation was done.
From the randomly selected patients, we had 38 (45.2%) infants for general anesthesia and 46 (54.8%) for spinal anesthesia. None of our primary endpoints favored any of the study groups, and the clinical short-term outcome of the infants was similar in the neonates born both by spinal and general anesthesia (P>0.05). The biochemical assays did not rule out or confirm any differences in the occurrence of perinatal stress (P>0.05).
Anesthesia type does not seem to influence the short-term outcome of the newborn infants for the elective cesarean deliveries. We believe that both spinal and general anesthesia could be performed in elective term cesarean deliveries without any risk to the newborn infants.
比较全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉对择期剖宫产出生新生儿短期结局的影响。
1999年1月至2000年7月入住我院的孕妇,计划在妊娠37周后择期再次剖宫产,在获得知情同意后随机分配接受脊髓麻醉或全身麻醉。记录产妇年龄、孕周、出生体重、阿氏评分、住院时间和剖宫产时间。记录新生儿呼吸抑制、围产期窒息发生率及新生儿重症监护病房收治率。我们还研究了从脐带采集的动脉血样本的pH值、碳酸氢盐、动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)和动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)。测量新生儿血清中心肌特异性同工酶肌酸激酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶、丙氨酸转氨酶水平及总皮质醇水平,以排除围产期应激并确诊围产期窒息(及心肌损伤)。采用成组t检验、卡方检验进行统计分析,并进行效能计算。
从随机选择的患者中,38例(45.2%)婴儿接受全身麻醉,46例(54.8%)接受脊髓麻醉。我们的主要终点均不支持任何一个研究组,脊髓麻醉和全身麻醉出生的新生儿临床短期结局相似(P>0.05)。生化检测未排除或证实围产期应激发生率存在差异(P>0.05)。
麻醉方式似乎不影响择期剖宫产新生儿的短期结局。我们认为,择期足月剖宫产时,脊髓麻醉和全身麻醉均可实施,对新生儿均无风险。