Sutherland S E
Department of Dentistry, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Can Dent Assoc. 2001 Nov;67(10):582-5.
Critical appraisal methods assist the reader in assessing the validity (closeness to the truth) and the relevance (usefulness in everyday practice) of research findings. The specific techniques of critical appraisal can vary somewhat, depending on the nature of the research question. In this paper, the final in a 6-part series on evidence-based dentistry, frameworks are presented to enable the judicious reader of the dental literature to apply sensible questions to the evaluation of papers related to diagnosis, etiology and prognosis.
批判性评价方法有助于读者评估研究结果的有效性(与事实的接近程度)和相关性(在日常实践中的实用性)。批判性评价的具体技巧可能会有所不同,这取决于研究问题的性质。在这篇关于循证牙科的6部分系列文章的最后一篇中,将介绍一些框架,以使牙科文献的明智读者能够对与诊断、病因和预后相关的论文评估提出合理的问题。