Suppr超能文献

循证牙科:第四部分。研究设计与证据级别。

Evidence-based dentistry: Part IV. Research design and levels of evidence.

作者信息

Sutherland S E

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Can Dent Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug;67(7):375-8.

Abstract

Previous papers in this series on evidence-based dentistry have discussed the first 2 steps in seeking answers to clinical problems formulating a clear question and strategically searching for evidence. The next step, critical appraisal of the evidence, is made easier if one understands the basic concepts of clinical research design. The strongest design, especially for questions related to therapeutic or preventive interventions, is the randomized, controlled trial. Questions relating to diagnosis, prognosis and causation are often studied with observational, rather than experimental, research designs. The strongest study design should be used whenever possible. Rules have been established to grade research evidence. This paper, the fourth in the series, presents an overview of research methodology most commonly used in the dental literature.

摘要

本系列关于循证牙科的往期论文讨论了在寻求临床问题答案时的前两个步骤

提出清晰的问题并策略性地搜索证据。如果一个人理解临床研究设计的基本概念,那么接下来对证据的批判性评价就会更容易。最强有力的设计,尤其是对于与治疗或预防干预相关的问题,是随机对照试验。与诊断、预后和因果关系相关的问题通常采用观察性而非实验性研究设计进行研究。只要有可能,就应使用最强有力的研究设计。已经制定了对研究证据进行分级的规则。本文是该系列的第四篇,概述了牙科文献中最常用的研究方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验