Chen G, Dunbar R L, Gao W, Ebner T J
Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 15;21(24):9877-87. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-09877.2001.
This study investigated the mechanisms underlying the recently reported fast spreading acidification and transient depression in the cerebellar cortex in vivo. Spreading acidification was evoked by surface stimulation in the rat and mouse cerebellar cortex stained with the pH-sensitive dye neutral red and monitored using epifluorescent imaging. The probability of evoking spreading acidification was dependent on stimulation parameters; greater frequency and/or greater amplitude were more effective. Although activation of the parallel fibers defined the geometry of the spread, their activation alone was not sufficient, because blocking synaptic transmission with low Ca(2+) prevented spreading acidification. Increased postsynaptic excitability was also a major factor. Application of either AMPA or metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists reduced the likelihood of evoking spreading acidification, but stronger stimulation intensities were still effective. Conversely, superfusion with GABA receptor antagonists decreased the threshold for evoking spreading acidification. Blocking nitric oxide synthase (NOS) increased the threshold for spreading acidification, and nitric oxide donors lowered the threshold. However, spreading acidification could be evoked in neuronal NOS-deficient mice (B6;129S-Nos1(tm1plh)). The depression in cortical excitability that accompanies spreading acidification occurred in the presence of AMPA and metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists and NOS inhibitors. These findings suggest that spreading acidification is dependent on extracellular Ca(2+) and glutamate neurotransmission with a contribution from both AMPA and metabotropic glutamate receptors and is modulated by nitric oxide. Therefore, spreading acidification involves both presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms. We hypothesize that a regenerative process, i.e., a nonpassive process, is operative that uses the cortical architecture to account for the high speed of propagation.
本研究调查了近期报道的在体小脑皮质快速扩散性酸化和短暂抑制现象背后的机制。在大鼠和小鼠小脑皮质中,用pH敏感染料中性红染色,通过表面刺激诱发扩散性酸化,并使用落射荧光成像进行监测。诱发扩散性酸化的概率取决于刺激参数;更高的频率和/或更大的幅度更有效。虽然平行纤维的激活确定了扩散的几何形状,但仅其激活并不足够,因为用低钙阻断突触传递可防止扩散性酸化。突触后兴奋性增加也是一个主要因素。应用AMPA或代谢型谷氨酸受体拮抗剂可降低诱发扩散性酸化的可能性,但更强的刺激强度仍然有效。相反,用GABA受体拮抗剂灌流可降低诱发扩散性酸化的阈值。阻断一氧化氮合酶(NOS)可提高扩散性酸化的阈值,而一氧化氮供体则降低阈值。然而,在神经元型NOS缺陷小鼠(B6;129S-Nos1(tm1plh))中也可诱发扩散性酸化。伴随扩散性酸化出现的皮质兴奋性抑制在存在AMPA和代谢型谷氨酸受体拮抗剂以及NOS抑制剂的情况下仍会发生。这些发现表明,扩散性酸化依赖于细胞外钙和谷氨酸神经传递,AMPA和代谢型谷氨酸受体均有贡献,且受一氧化氮调节。因此,扩散性酸化涉及突触前和突触后机制。我们推测,一种再生过程,即非被动过程,在起作用,它利用皮质结构来解释传播的高速性。