Suppr超能文献

足跟超声骨密度在男性中的应用价值。

Utility of heel ultrasound bone density in men.

作者信息

Adler R A, Funkhouser H L, Holt C M

机构信息

Endocrinology and Metabolism Section, Medical Service, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Boulevard, Richmond, VA 23249, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2001 Fall;4(3):225-30. doi: 10.1385/jcd:4:3:225.

Abstract

In women, heel ultrasound (US) bone mineral density (BMD) has been shown to predict fracture risk, but the usefulness of this screening tool in men is not known. We measured the heel quantitative ultrasound index (QUI( in a convenience sample 185 of men (136 Caucasian, 1 Asian, and 48 African-American) with an average age of 63 yr (range of 25-85) undergoing BMD of the spine and hip by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to determine whether the heel measurement could predict central BMD. The average DXA T-score was -0.97, -1.20, and -1.61 for the spine, total hip, and femoral neck, respectively. The mean heel US BMD T-score (using the only available T-score, which was defined for Caucasian postmenopausal women) was -0.92. There were significant correlations among the various DXA measurements and the heel US BMD T-score (r = 0.373-0.483, p < 0.001). We defined arbitrarily osteopenia as a spine, total hip, or femoral neck T-score by DXA of < -1.5. We also made two different arbitrary definitions of osteoporosis by DXA: < -2.0 and < -2.5. Using these numbers as disease definitions, we determined the specificity, sensitivity, as well as positive and negative predictive values of using the heel US T-score to predict osteopenia or osteoporosis. Using various cutoffs for the heel T-score, we found that increasing the cutoff toward 0 increased the sensitivity but lowered the specificity. No cutoff was found that provided both good sensitivity and specificity. By analyzing the men by ethnic and age groups, we found that the best set of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was derived from data using heel US to predict osteopenia and osteoporosis in men younger than age 65, although the areas under the ROC curve were approx 0.8. In conclusion, despite a strong correlation between the heel QUI and the spine and hip BMD by DXA, no heel T-score could predict osteopenia or osteoporosis with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. It is possible that the use of risk factor assessment plus heel QUI might have better predictive value, and further studies are needed to determine whether heel QUI or other US determination is an independent risk factor for fracture in men.

摘要

在女性中,足跟超声(US)骨密度(BMD)已被证明可预测骨折风险,但这种筛查工具在男性中的效用尚不清楚。我们在一个便利样本中测量了185名男性(136名白种人、1名亚洲人和48名非裔美国人)的足跟定量超声指数(QUI),这些男性平均年龄为63岁(范围25 - 85岁),正在接受双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量脊柱和髋部的骨密度,以确定足跟测量值是否能预测中心骨密度。脊柱、全髋和股骨颈的平均DXA T值分别为 -0.97、-1.20和 -1.61。足跟US骨密度T值的平均值(使用唯一可用的T值,该值是为白种人绝经后女性定义的)为 -0.92。各种DXA测量值与足跟US骨密度T值之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.373 - 0.483,p < 0.001)。我们将DXA测量的脊柱、全髋或股骨颈T值 < -1.5任意定义为骨质减少。我们还通过DXA对骨质疏松症进行了两种不同的任意定义:< -2.0和< -2.5。使用这些数值作为疾病定义,我们确定了使用足跟US T值预测骨质减少或骨质疏松症的特异性、敏感性以及阳性和阴性预测值。使用足跟T值的各种截断值,我们发现将截断值向0增加会提高敏感性但降低特异性。未发现能同时提供良好敏感性和特异性的截断值。通过按种族和年龄组分析这些男性,我们发现最佳的一组受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来自使用足跟US预测65岁以下男性骨质减少和骨质疏松症的数据,尽管ROC曲线下面积约为0.8。总之,尽管足跟QUI与DXA测量的脊柱和髋部骨密度之间存在很强的相关性,但没有足跟T值能够以令人满意的敏感性和特异性预测骨质减少或骨质疏松症。使用风险因素评估加上足跟QUI可能具有更好的预测价值,并且需要进一步研究来确定足跟QUI或其他US测定是否是男性骨折的独立风险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验