Adler Robert A, Funkhouser Holly L, Petkov Valentina I, Elmore Belinda L, Via Patricia S, McMurtry Cynthia T, Adera Tilahun
Section of Endocrinology, Medical Service, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA.
Chest. 2003 Jun;123(6):2012-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.6.2012.
Patients in a pulmonary clinic have disorders that predispose them to osteoporosis and may use glucocorticoid therapy, which has been associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk. Ideally, all patients at risk for osteoporosis would be screened using the best test available, which is central BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We proposed to stratify the risk for osteoporosis by the use of a simple questionnaire and point-of-care heel ultrasound BMD measurements.
Cross-sectional screening study.
Pulmonary clinic in a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Approximately 200 male and female patients who had not had previous BMD testing were eligible for the study, and 107 gave consent.
One hundred seven men (white, 71 men; black, 35 men; and Asian, 1 man) underwent heel BMD testing and filled out a questionnaire. Ninety-eight men underwent a central DXA.
Of 98 subjects, 24.5% had a spine, total hip, or femoral neck (FN) T-score of <or= -2.5, which is the generally accepted definition of osteoporosis diagnosed using DXA, and 44.9% had a T-score of <or= -2.0. The best-fit models for predicting FN or total hip BMD included body weight, heel BMD, corticosteroid use for >or= 7 days, and race, which accounted for 52 to 57% of the variance. When a heel ultrasound T-score of -1.0 was tested to predict a central DXA T-score of -2.0, the sensitivity was 61% and the specificity 64%. Adding the questionnaire score and body mass index (BMI) to the heel T-score improved sensitivity but not specificity. Moreover, BMI and age predicted central BMD with similar sensitivity and specificity. Importantly, of 24 patients with a central DXA T-score of <or= -2.5, only 14 were identified by a heel T-score of <or= -1.0.
Although the findings from a heel ultrasound plus the answers to a questionnaire were reasonably good indicators for predicting the presence of low BMD, little predictability was gained over the use of BMI and age. In a group of pulmonary clinic patients, the prevalence of osteoporosis was clinically significant, and central DXA testing was the preferable technique for identifying patients who were at risk for fracture.
肺部门诊患者易患骨质疏松症,且可能接受糖皮质激素治疗,而糖皮质激素治疗与低骨密度(BMD)及骨折风险增加有关。理想情况下,所有有骨质疏松症风险的患者都应使用现有最佳检测方法进行筛查,即通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)检测中心骨密度。我们建议通过使用一份简单问卷及即时足跟超声骨密度测量来对骨质疏松症风险进行分层。
横断面筛查研究。
一家退伍军人事务医疗中心的肺部门诊。
约200名此前未进行过骨密度检测的男性和女性患者符合研究条件,107人同意参与。
107名男性(白人71名、黑人35名、亚洲人1名)接受足跟骨密度检测并填写问卷。98名男性接受了中心DXA检测。
在98名受试者中,24.5%的人脊柱、全髋或股骨颈(FN)的T值小于或等于 -2.5,这是使用DXA诊断骨质疏松症的普遍接受的定义,44.9%的人T值小于或等于 -2.0。预测FN或全髋骨密度的最佳拟合模型包括体重、足跟骨密度、使用糖皮质激素≥7天以及种族,这些因素解释了52%至57%的方差。当检测足跟超声T值为 -1.0来预测中心DXA T值为 -2.0时,敏感性为61%,特异性为64%。将问卷得分和体重指数(BMI)加入足跟T值可提高敏感性,但不能提高特异性。此外,BMI和年龄预测中心骨密度的敏感性和特异性相似。重要的是,在24名中心DXA T值小于或等于 -2.5的患者中,只有14名通过足跟T值小于或等于 -1.0被识别出来。
尽管足跟超声检查结果加上问卷答案是预测低骨密度存在的相当好的指标,但与使用BMI和年龄相比,预测性提升不大。在一组肺部门诊患者中,骨质疏松症患病率具有临床意义,中心DXA检测是识别骨折风险患者的首选技术。