Jenerette G Darrel, Lee Jay, Waller David W, Carlson Robert E
Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA.
Environ Manage. 2002 Jan;29(1):67-75. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0041-z.
The ecoregion concept is a popular method of understanding the spatial distribution of the environment', however, it has yet to be adequately demonstrated that the environment is distributed in accordance with these bounded units. In this paper, we generated a testable hypothesis based on the current usage of ecoregions: the ecoregion classification will allow for discrimination between lakes of different water quality. The ecoregion classification should also be more effective better than a comparably scaled classification based on political boundaries, land-use class, or random grouping. To test this hypothesis we used the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) lake water chemistry data from the northeast United States. The water chemistry data were reduced to four components using principal component analysis. For comparison to an optimal grouping of these data we used K-means cluster analysis to define the extent at which these lakes could be segregated into distinct classes. Jackknifed discriminant analysis was used to determine the classification rate of ecoregions, the three alternative spatial classification methods, and the clustering algorithm. The classification based on ecoregions was successful for 35% of the lakes included in this study, in comparison to the clustered groups accuracy of 98%. These results suggest that the large scale spatial distribution of ecosystem types is more complicated than that suggested by the present ecoregion boundaries. Further tests of ecoregion delineations are needed and alternative large-scale management strategies should be investigated.
生态区概念是理解环境空间分布的一种常用方法,然而,目前尚无充分证据表明环境是按照这些界定的单元进行分布的。在本文中,我们基于生态区的当前用途提出了一个可检验的假设:生态区分类将能够区分不同水质的湖泊。生态区分类也应该比基于政治边界、土地利用类别或随机分组的同等规模分类更有效。为了检验这一假设,我们使用了美国东北部环境监测与评估计划(EMAP)的湖泊水化学数据。通过主成分分析将水化学数据简化为四个成分。为了与这些数据的最优分组进行比较,我们使用K均值聚类分析来确定这些湖泊能够被划分为不同类别的程度。留一法判别分析用于确定生态区、三种替代空间分类方法以及聚类算法的分类率。基于生态区的分类对于本研究中35%的湖泊是成功的,相比之下,聚类组的准确率为98%。这些结果表明,生态系统类型的大规模空间分布比当前生态区边界所表明的更为复杂。需要对生态区的划定进行进一步测试,并应研究替代的大规模管理策略。