Greenspan S L, von Stetten E, Emond S K, Jones L, Parker R A
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Osteoporosis Prevention and Treatment Center, Lilliane S. Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 1110, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Clin Densitom. 2001 Winter;4(4):373-80. doi: 10.1385/jcd:4:4:373.
The presence of a vertebral fracture significantly increases the risk of future fracture, classifies a patient with "clinical" osteoporosis, and usually results in treatment for osteoporosis. However, the majority of vertebral fractures are silent, and lateral X-rays (the standard method for identification) are not routinely obtained. Instant vertebral assessment (IVA), a technology that utilizes dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), provides rapid assessment of vertebral fractures and is highly correlated with vertebral fractures, as assessed on standard lateral spine X-rays. To assess the role of IVA in patient management, we examined standard bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine, total hip, and femoral neck and spine IVA by DXA in 482 participants screened for an osteoporosis study, who had no previous knowledge of vertebral fractures. Using World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, subjects were classified using BMD at the spine, total hip, femoral neck, or any combination of these central sites. In addition, we considered subjects as osteoporotic if they had vertebral fractures independent of low bone density. We found that vertebral fractures assessed by IVA were present in 18.3% of asymptomatic postmenopausal women recruited for this study. The sensitivity of BMD alone to diagnose osteoporosis based on either a vertebral fracture or low BMD using WHO criteria ranged from 40 to 74%. This means that between 26 and 60% of osteoporotic individuals could have potentially been missed. Furthermore, 11.0-18.7% of clinically osteoporotic individuals would have been classified as normal by BMD criteria alone. We conclude that IVA is a useful adjunct in the clinical identification of osteoporosis and may prevent mismanagement of osteoporotic patients.
椎体骨折的存在会显著增加未来骨折的风险,将患者归类为患有“临床”骨质疏松症,并且通常会导致对骨质疏松症的治疗。然而,大多数椎体骨折是无症状的,而且通常不会常规进行侧位X线检查(识别椎体骨折的标准方法)。即时椎体评估(IVA)是一种利用双能X线吸收法(DXA)的技术,它能快速评估椎体骨折,并且与标准侧位脊柱X线检查所评估的椎体骨折高度相关。为了评估IVA在患者管理中的作用,我们对482名参与骨质疏松症研究筛查且此前不知道自己有椎体骨折的参与者进行了DXA检查,以测量其脊柱、全髋和股骨颈的标准骨密度(BMD)以及脊柱IVA。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的指南,利用脊柱、全髋、股骨颈或这些中心部位的任何组合处的BMD对受试者进行分类。此外,如果受试者有独立于低骨密度的椎体骨折,我们也将其视为骨质疏松症患者。我们发现,在为本研究招募的无症状绝经后女性中,通过IVA评估发现18.3%存在椎体骨折。仅根据椎体骨折或使用WHO标准的低BMD来诊断骨质疏松症时,BMD的敏感性范围为40%至74%。这意味着26%至60%的骨质疏松症患者可能会被漏诊。此外,仅根据BMD标准,11.0%至18.7%的临床骨质疏松症患者会被归类为正常。我们得出结论,IVA是临床识别骨质疏松症的有用辅助手段,可能会防止对骨质疏松症患者的管理不当。