Wells George A, Hsieh Shu-Ching, Peterson Joan, Zheng Carine, Kelly Shannon E, Shea Beverley, Tugwell Peter
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Cardiovascular Research Methods Center, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD001155. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001155.pub3.
Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration, leading to increased fracture risk. Alendronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs, which inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts (bone cells that break down bone tissue). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2008.
To assess the benefits and harms of alendronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk of fracture, respectively.
We searched Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (which includes CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, two trial registers, drug approval agency websites, and the bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews to identify the studies included in this review. The latest search date was 01 February 2023. We imposed no restrictions on language, date, form of publication, or reported outcomes.
We included only randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of alendronate on postmenopausal women. Targeted participants must have received at least one year of alendronate. We classified a study as secondary prevention if its population met one or more of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, a low bone mineral density T-score (-2.5 or lower), and 75 years old or older. If a study population met none of those criteria, we classified it as a primary prevention study.
Our major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events.
We used the Cochrane risk of bias 1 tool.
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Based on the previous review experience, in which the clinical and methodological characteristics in the primary and secondary prevention studies were homogeneous, we used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and estimated effects using the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. Our base case analyses included all eligible placebo-controlled studies with usable data. We selected the data available for the longest treatment period. We consider a relative change exceeding 15% as clinically important.
We included 119 studies, of which 102 studies provided data for quantitative synthesis. Of these, we classified 34 studies (15,188 participants) as primary prevention and 68 studies (29,577 participants) as secondary prevention. We had concerns about risks of bias in most studies. Selection bias was the most frequently overlooked domain, with only 20 studies (19%) describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Eight studies (8%) were at low risk of bias in all seven domains.
The base case analyses included 16 primary prevention studies (one to five years in length; 10,057 women) and 20 secondary prevention studies (one to three years in length; 7375 women) which compared alendronate 10 mg/day (or 70 mg/week) to placebo, no treatment, or both. Indirectness, imprecision, and risk of bias emerged as the main factors contributing to the downgrading of the certainty of the evidence. For primary prevention, alendronate may lead to a clinically important reduction in clinical vertebral fractures (16/1190 in the alendronate group versus 24/926 in the placebo group; RR 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.84; absolute risk reduction [ARR] 1.4% fewer, 95% CI 1.9% fewer to 0.4% fewer; low-certainty evidence) and non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97; ARR 1.6% fewer, 95% CI 2.6% fewer to 0.3% fewer; low-certainty evidence). However, clinically important differences were not observed for the following outcomes: hip fractures (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.32; ARR 0.2% fewer, 95% CI 0.4% fewer to 0.2% more; low-certainty evidence); wrist fractures (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.49; ARR 0.3% more, 95% CI 0.4% fewer to 1.1% more; low-certainty evidence); withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.18; ARR 0.2% more, 95% CI 0.9% fewer to 1.5% more; low-certainty evidence); and serious adverse events (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43; ARR 0.5% more, 95% CI 1.2% fewer to 2.8% more; low-certainty evidence). For secondary prevention, alendronate probably results in a clinically important reduction in clinical vertebral fractures (24/1114 in the alendronate group versus 51/1055 in the placebo group; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73; ARR 2.7% fewer, 95% CI 3.5% fewer to 1.3% fewer; moderate-certainty evidence). It may lead to a clinically important reduction in non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; ARR 2.8% fewer, 95% CI 5.1% fewer to 0.1% fewer; low-certainty evidence); hip fractures (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96; ARR 1.0% fewer, 95% CI 1.5% fewer to 0.1% fewer; low-certainty evidence); wrist fractures (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90; ARR 1.8% fewer, 95% CI 2.6% fewer to 0.4% fewer; low-certainty evidence); and serious adverse events (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; ARR 3.5% fewer, 95% CI 5.8% fewer to 0.6% fewer; low-certainty evidence). However, the effects of alendronate for withdrawals due to adverse events are uncertain (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.16; ARR 0.4% fewer, 95% CI 1.7% fewer to 1.3% more; very low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, the updated evidence for the safety risks of alendronate suggests that, irrespective of participants' risk of fracture, alendronate may lead to little or no difference for gastrointestinal adverse events. Zero incidents of osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture were observed.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For primary prevention, compared to placebo, alendronate 10 mg/day may reduce clinical vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, but it might make little or no difference to hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. For secondary prevention, alendronate probably reduces clinical vertebral fractures, and may reduce non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, and serious adverse events, compared to placebo. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of alendronate on withdrawals due to adverse events.
This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.
This review is an update of the previous review (DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001155).
骨质疏松症是骨量异常减少和骨质退化,导致骨折风险增加。阿仑膦酸钠属于双膦酸盐类药物,通过干扰破骨细胞(分解骨组织的骨细胞)的活性来抑制骨吸收。这是2008年首次发表的Cochrane综述的更新版。
分别评估阿仑膦酸钠在骨折风险较低和较高的绝经后女性中,对原发性和继发性骨质疏松性骨折预防的益处和危害。
我们检索了循证医学综述(包括CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、两个试验注册库、药品审批机构网站以及相关系统评价的参考文献,以确定本综述纳入的研究。最新检索日期为2023年2月1日。我们对语言、日期、出版形式或报告的结果均未设限制。
我们仅纳入评估阿仑膦酸钠对绝经后女性影响的随机对照试验。目标参与者必须接受至少一年的阿仑膦酸钠治疗。如果一项研究的人群符合以下分层标准中的一项或多项,我们将其分类为二级预防:骨质疏松症诊断、椎体骨折病史。骨密度T值低(-2.5或更低)以及75岁及以上。如果一项研究人群不符合这些标准中的任何一项,我们将其分类为一级预防研究。
我们的主要结局指标是临床椎体骨折、非椎体骨折、髋部骨折和腕部骨折、因不良事件退出研究以及严重不良事件。
我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险1工具。
我们采用Cochrane预期的标准方法程序。基于之前的综述经验,其中一级和二级预防研究的临床和方法学特征是同质的,我们使用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析,并使用风险比(RR)估计二分结局的效应。我们的基础病例分析包括所有有可用数据的符合条件的安慰剂对照研究。我们选择了最长治疗期的可用数据。我们认为相对变化超过15%具有临床意义。
我们纳入了119项研究,其中102项研究提供了定量综合分析的数据。其中,我们将34项研究(15188名参与者)分类为一级预防,68项研究(29577名参与者)分类为二级预防。我们对大多数研究的偏倚风险表示担忧。选择偏倚是最常被忽视的领域,只有20项研究(19%)描述了序列生成和分配隐藏的适当方法。八项研究(8%)在所有七个领域的偏倚风险较低。
基础病例分析包括16项一级预防研究(为期一至五年;10057名女性)和20项二级预防研究(为期一至三年;7375名女性),这些研究将每日10毫克(或每周70毫克)的阿仑膦酸钠与安慰剂、不治疗或两者进行了比较。间接性、不精确性和偏倚风险是导致证据确定性降级的主要因素。对于一级预防,阿仑膦酸钠可能会使临床椎体骨折在临床上有显著减少(阿仑膦酸钠组16/1190,安慰剂组24/926;RR 0.45,95%置信区间[CI]0.25至0.84;绝对风险降低[ARR]少1.4%,95%CI少1.9%至少0.4%;低确定性证据)和非椎体骨折(RR 0.83,95%CI 0.72至0.97;ARR少1.6%,95%CI少2.6%至少0.3%;低确定性证据)。然而,在以下结局中未观察到具有临床意义的差异:髋部骨折(RR 0.76,95%CI 0.43至1.32;ARR少0.2%,95%CI少0.4%至多0.2%;低确定性证据);腕部骨折(RR 1.12,95%CI 0.84至1.49;ARR多0.3%,95%CI少0.4%至多1.1%;低确定性证据);因不良事件退出研究(RR 1.03,95%CI 0.89至1.18;ARR多0.2%,95%CI少0.9%至多1.5%;低确定性证据);以及严重不良事件(RR 1.08,95%CI 0.82至1.43;ARR多0.5%,95%CI少1.2%至多2.8%;低确定性证据)。对于二级预防,阿仑膦酸钠可能会使临床椎体骨折在临床上有显著减少(阿仑膦酸钠组24/1114,安慰剂组51/1055;RR 0.45,95%CI 0.28至0.73;ARR少2.7%,95%CI少3.5%至少1.3%;中等确定性证据)。它可能会使非椎体骨折在临床上有显著减少(RR 0.80,95%CI 0.64至0.99;ARR少2.8%,95%CI少5.1%至少0.1%;低确定性证据);髋部骨折(RR 0.49,95%CI 0.25至0.96;ARR少1.0%,95%CI少1.5%至少0.1%;低确定性证据);腕部骨折(RR 0.54,95%CI 0.33至0.90;ARR少1.8%,95%CI少2.6%至少0.4%;低确定性证据);以及严重不良事件(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.59至0.96;ARR少3.5%,95%CI少5.8%至少0.6%;低确定性证据)。然而,阿仑膦酸钠对因不良事件退出研究的影响尚不确定(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.78至1.16;ARR少0.4%,95%CI少1.7%至多1.3%;极低确定性证据)。此外,阿仑膦酸钠安全性风险的更新证据表明,无论参与者的骨折风险如何,阿仑膦酸钠可能导致胃肠道不良事件几乎没有差异或没有差异。未观察到颌骨坏死和非典型股骨骨折的病例。
对于一级预防,与安慰剂相比,每日10毫克的阿仑膦酸钠可能会减少临床椎体和非椎体骨折,但对髋部和腕部骨折、因不良事件退出研究以及严重不良事件可能几乎没有差异或没有差异。对于二级预防,与安慰剂相比,阿仑膦酸钠可能会减少临床椎体骨折,并且可能会减少非椎体、髋部和腕部骨折以及严重不良事件。关于阿仑膦酸钠对因不良事件退出研究的影响,证据非常不确定。
本Cochrane综述没有专项资助。
本综述是之前综述的更新版(DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001155)。