Suppr超能文献

适用于医疗机构老年人群的简易营养筛查工具的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of simple nutrition screening tools adapted to the elderly population in healthcare facilities.

作者信息

Laporte M, Villalon L, Thibodeau J, Payette H

机构信息

Food and Nutrition Services, Campbellton Regional Hospital, New Brunswick, Canada.

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2001;5(4):292-4.

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the validity and the reliability of simple tools to screen the protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) risk among the elderly population in healthcare facilities. An initial screening tool, made up of nine PEM risk factors, was previously developed to be validated. This tool was quite complex and showed low validity results. A stepwise regression analysis determined significant risk factors (P < or = 0.05) among those included in the initial tool. These were the foundation to develop two simplified screening tools. One included Body Mass Index (BMI) and % weight loss over time. The second included BMI and albumin. Both tools classified subjects in low or high PEM risk levels. In the present study, the simple tools were assessed in a sample of 142 elderly subjects divided into two categories: acute care elderly (ACE, n=72) and long-term care elderly (LTCE, n=70). The simple tools were administered by a dietetic technician and a nurse with the purpose of assessing inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities. The criterion validity of the simple tools were assessed in comparison to in-depth nutritional assessments carried out by a dietitian. The validity results were ranked between 60.5% and 91.7%. The reliability scores showed levels of agreement of 70.8% to 93.1% and kappa coefficients ranking between 0.59(+/-0.07) and 0.79(+/-0.05). Simple tools are now available for efficiently screening the PEM risk among the elderly population on a healthcare facility-wide basis.

摘要

本研究旨在评估用于筛查医疗机构中老年人群蛋白质-能量营养不良(PEM)风险的简单工具的有效性和可靠性。先前开发了一种由九个PEM风险因素组成的初步筛查工具,以待验证。该工具相当复杂,有效性结果较低。逐步回归分析确定了初始工具中包含的显著风险因素(P≤0.05)。这些因素是开发两种简化筛查工具的基础。一种工具包括体重指数(BMI)和随时间的体重减轻百分比。另一种工具包括BMI和白蛋白。两种工具都将受试者分为低PEM风险水平或高PEM风险水平。在本研究中,在142名老年受试者的样本中评估了这些简单工具,这些受试者分为两类:急性护理老年人(ACE,n = 72)和长期护理老年人(LTCE,n = 70)。这些简单工具由一名饮食技术员和一名护士进行管理,目的是评估评分者间信度和重测信度。与营养师进行的深入营养评估相比,评估了这些简单工具的效标效度。效度结果在60.5%至91.7%之间。信度得分显示一致性水平为70.8%至93.1%,kappa系数在0.59(±0.07)至0.79(±0.05)之间。现在有了简单工具可在整个医疗机构范围内有效筛查老年人群的PEM风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验