儿童急性髓系白血病体外化疗耐药的临床相关性
Clinical relevance of in vitro chemoresistance in childhood acute myeloid leukemia.
作者信息
Yamada S, Hongo T, Okada S, Watanabe C, Fujii Y, Ohzeki T
机构信息
Department of Pediatrics, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
出版信息
Leukemia. 2001 Dec;15(12):1892-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402305.
To determine the clinical relevance of in vitro drug chemoresistance in childhood acute myeloid leukemia, we used an MTT assay to test leukemic cells from 132 newly diagnosed children. Patients were diagnosed according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification as follows: M0 (n = 12), M1 (n = 16), M2 (n = 53), M4 (n = 17), M5 (n = 19) and M7 (n = 15). The results revealed that, compared to leukemic cells from complete-responders (n = 107), those from non-responders who failed induction therapy (n = 17) were 1.4 to 5.0 times more resistant in vitro to cytarabine (P = 0.005), melphalan (P = 0.003), etoposide (P = 0.011), L-asparaginase (P = 0.017), aclarubicin (P = 0.026) and dexamethasone (P = 0.039). For seven other drugs tested, the median lethal dose of 70% and leukemic cell survival of non-responders were higher than those of complete-responders, but the difference was not statistically significant. We sought correlations between FAB subtypes and in vitro drug resistance. Leukemias of the FAB M4 and M5 subtype were more sensitive to L-asparaginase (P = 0.01, P = 0.0036) than those of the FAB M2 subtype. FAB M5 leukemia was more sensitive to etoposide than were the FAB M2, M4 and M7 subtypes (P = 0.001, P = 0.034, P = 0.023, respectively). By contrast, FAB M5 leukemia was significantly more resistant to prednisolone and dexamethasone than were the FAB M0, M1, M2, M4 and M7 subtypes. We sought correlations between in vitro drug resistance and long-term clinical outcome, but found no associations in this case. These results suggest that in vitro resistance to cytarabine, melphalan, etoposide, L-asparaginase, aclarubicin and dexamethasone might represent factors that can predict response to the early course of therapy. Selecting an appropriate anti-cancer drug according to the FAB classification together with drug sensitivity testing may contribute to improved prognoses in childhood acute myeloid leukemia.
为了确定儿童急性髓系白血病体外化疗耐药性的临床相关性,我们使用MTT法检测了132例新诊断儿童的白血病细胞。患者根据法国 - 美国 - 英国(FAB)分类诊断如下:M0(n = 12)、M1(n = 16)、M2(n = 53)、M4(n = 17)、M5(n = 19)和M7(n = 15)。结果显示,与完全缓解者(n = 107)的白血病细胞相比,诱导治疗失败的未缓解者(n = 17)的白血病细胞对阿糖胞苷(P = 0.005)、美法仑(P = 0.003)、依托泊苷(P = 0.011)、L - 天冬酰胺酶(P = 0.017)、阿克拉霉素(P = 0.026)和地塞米松(P = 0.039)的体外耐药性高1.4至5.0倍。对于其他七种测试药物,未缓解者的70%中位致死剂量和白血病细胞存活率高于完全缓解者,但差异无统计学意义。我们寻找FAB亚型与体外耐药性之间的相关性。FAB M4和M5亚型的白血病比FAB M2亚型的白血病对L - 天冬酰胺酶更敏感(P = 0.01,P = 0.0036)。FAB M5白血病比FAB M2、M4和M7亚型对依托泊苷更敏感(分别为P = = 0.001,P = 0.034,P = 0.023)。相比之下,FAB M5白血病比FAB M0、M1、M2、M4和M7亚型对泼尼松龙和地塞米松的耐药性明显更高。我们寻找体外耐药性与长期临床结局之间的相关性,但在本研究中未发现关联。这些结果表明,对阿糖胞苷、美法仑、依托泊苷、L - 天冬酰胺酶、阿克拉霉素和地塞米松的体外耐药性可能是预测早期治疗反应的因素。根据FAB分类并结合药物敏感性测试选择合适的抗癌药物可能有助于改善儿童急性髓系白血病的预后。