Walterhouse D O, Pappo A S, Baker K S, Parham D M, Anderson J R, Donaldson S S, Paidas C N, Womer R B, Crist W M
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA.
Cancer. 2001 Dec 15;92(12):3135-46. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011215)92:12<3135::aid-cncr10172>3.0.co;2-y.
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the parotid region is rare and to the authors' knowledge little information is available regarding the site of tumor origin, clinical presentation, and outcome in these patients. Therefore, the authors reviewed the files of all patients with RMS of the parotid region who were registered on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS) I-IV.
Patient charts and the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) database were reviewed.
Sixty-two patients presenting with a mass in the parotid region were identified. None of the tumors was localized exclusively to the parotid gland, so the primary site was referred to as the "parotid region." The tumor invaded a parameningeal site in 30 patients. These cases have been designated as parameningeal-parotid tumors to distinguish them from 32 cases that did not invade a parameningeal site and were designated as nonparameningeal-parotid tumors. The majority of patients had Group III tumors in both the nonparameningeal-parotid and parameningeal-parotid subgroups. However, although there were 16 patients with Group I or II tumors in the nonparameningeal-parotid subgroup, no patients with Group I or II tumors were found in the parameningeal-parotid subgroup (P = 0.001). Fifty-six of 62 patients (90%) received radiotherapy. The parameningeal primary site designation resulted in intensification of both chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with parameningeal-parotid RMS. The 5-year failure-free survival rate was 81% and the 5-year survival rate was 84%. There were no deaths reported among patients with Group I or II tumors. The 5-year failure-free survival did not appear to differ when comparing patients with parameningeal-parotid tumors with patients with nonparameningeal-parotid tumors (P = 0.21).
Treatment as defined by the IRS protocols has been reported to be highly effective for patients with RMS of the parotid region. Outcome for the more aggressively treated patients with parameningeal-parotid RMS appears similar to that for patients with nonparameningeal-parotid RMS.
腮腺区横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)较为罕见,据作者所知,关于这些患者肿瘤起源部位、临床表现及预后的信息较少。因此,作者回顾了在横纹肌肉瘤协作组研究(IRS)I-IV中登记的所有腮腺区RMS患者的病历。
查阅患者病历及横纹肌肉瘤协作组研究组(IRSG)数据库。
共识别出62例腮腺区有肿块的患者。无一例肿瘤仅局限于腮腺,因此将原发部位称为“腮腺区”。30例患者的肿瘤侵犯了颅底旁组织部位。这些病例被指定为颅底旁-腮腺肿瘤,以区别于32例未侵犯颅底旁组织部位的病例,后者被指定为非颅底旁-腮腺肿瘤。在非颅底旁-腮腺和颅底旁-腮腺亚组中,大多数患者为III组肿瘤。然而,虽然非颅底旁-腮腺亚组中有16例I组或II组肿瘤患者,但颅底旁-腮腺亚组中未发现I组或II组肿瘤患者(P = 0.001)。62例患者中有56例(90%)接受了放疗。颅底旁原发部位的指定导致颅底旁-腮腺RMS患者的化疗和放疗均强化。5年无瘤生存率为81%,5年生存率为84%。I组或II组肿瘤患者中未报告死亡病例。比较颅底旁-腮腺肿瘤患者和非颅底旁-腮腺肿瘤患者时,5年无瘤生存率似乎没有差异(P = 0.21)。
据报道,IRS方案所定义的治疗方法对腮腺区RMS患者非常有效。接受更积极治疗的颅底旁-腮腺RMS患者的预后似乎与非颅底旁-腮腺RMS患者相似。