Michalski Jeff M, Meza Jane, Breneman John C, Wolden Suzanne L, Laurie Fran, Jodoin MaryAnn, Raney Beverly, Wharam Moody D, Donaldson Sarah S
Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8224, 4921 Parkview Place, Lower Level, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 15;59(4):1027-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.064.
To evaluate the impact of radiation treatment parameters on cancer control outcomes for children with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (PM-RMS) treated on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group protocols II through IV (including IRS-IV pilot).
Radiation therapy (RT) treatment quality was assessed by contemporary review of portal radiographs, simulation films, treatment plans, and, in most cases, cross-sectional diagnostic imaging data for patients treated on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group protocols II through IV. Five hundred ninety-five patients with PM-RMS were registered on these 4 studies between 1978 and 1997. Most of these patients (95%) had Group III disease. Radiation doses varied over the span of these trials with protocol doses ranging from 40 Gy to 50.4 Gy on IRS-II and IRS-III and 50.4 Gy to 59.4 Gy (hyperfractionated) on IRS-IV pilot and IRS-IV. Patients with high-risk signs of meningeal impingement, including cranial nerve palsy (CNP) or cranial base bone erosion (CBBE) with or without intracranial extension (ICE), were required to start radiotherapy at the time of study entry (Day 0). Among 595 patients reviewed, 385 (65%) had diagnostic images submitted to the Quality Assurance Review Center for assessment of target volume coverage. Only 123 (21%) patients, 49 (40%) of whom were treated on IRS-II, received whole brain RT.
The estimated overall survival and failure-free survival rates were 73% and 69% at 5 years, respectively. The estimated 5-year local failure (LF) rate was 17%. The detection of ICE increased from 24% to 41% as more cross-sectional diagnostic images became available. For patients with any sign of meningeal impingement, starting RT <2 weeks after diagnosis (n = 315) had 18% LF compared to 33% LF if started >2 weeks after diagnosis (n = 43) (p = 0.03). For patients with ICE, starting RT <2 weeks after diagnosis (n = 177) resulted in LF in 16% compared to 37% among those who started >2 weeks after (n = 19) (p = 0.07). For patients with CNP and/or CBBE, starting RT <2 weeks after diagnosis (n = 138) resulted in 21% LF compared to 30% among those that started >2 weeks (n = 23) (p = 0.23). In none of these circumstances was the 5-year failure-free survival significantly impacted by this increase in LF. The estimated 3-year survival after local failure was 17% (95% CI, 10%-25%). For patients without signs of meningeal impingement, there was no difference in local control whether they started radiation therapy earlier or later than 10 weeks. Patients with large (> or =5 cm) Group III tumors had an LF rate of 35% if they received less than 47.5 Gy compared to an LF rate of 18% in patients who received less than 47.5 Gy with smaller tumors or a rate of 15% if they received more than 47.5 Gy, irrespective of tumor size (p = 0.14). There was no evidence that whole brain radiation therapy affected LF or reduced central nervous system (CNS) relapse. Multivariate analysis of RT parameters and clinical factors demonstrated that a radiation dose of >47.5 Gy was associated with lower LF. The presence of ICE, CNP, or CBBE and age >10 years at diagnosis were significantly associated with higher rates of local failure.
The availability of cross-sectional diagnostic images (CT or MRI) has improved detection of ICE. Starting radiation therapy within 2 weeks of diagnosis for patients with signs of meningeal impingement was associated with lower rates of local failure. When no signs of meningeal impingement were present, delay of radiation therapy for more than 10 weeks did not impact local failure rates. Whole brain radiation therapy is unnecessary in PM-RMS. A dose of at least 47.5 Gy seems to be associated with lower rates of local failure, especially when tumor diameter is > or =5 cm.
评估放疗参数对采用横纹肌肉瘤协作组(Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group)方案II至IV(包括IRS-IV试点方案)治疗的脑膜旁横纹肌肉瘤(PM-RMS)患儿癌症控制结局的影响。
通过对射野片、模拟片、治疗计划进行当代回顾,并在大多数情况下,对采用横纹肌肉瘤协作组方案II至IV治疗的患者的横断面诊断成像数据进行回顾,评估放射治疗(RT)的治疗质量。1978年至1997年期间,有595例PM-RMS患者登记参与这4项研究。这些患者中的大多数(95%)患有III组疾病。在这些试验期间,放射剂量有所不同,IRS-II和IRS-III的方案剂量范围为40 Gy至50.4 Gy,IRS-IV试点方案和IRS-IV的剂量范围为50.4 Gy至59.4 Gy(超分割)。有脑膜侵犯高危体征的患者,包括伴有或不伴有颅内扩展(ICE)的颅神经麻痹(CNP)或颅底骨侵蚀(CBBE),在研究入组时(第0天)即需开始放疗。在审查的595例患者中,385例(65%)提交了诊断影像至质量保证审查中心,以评估靶区覆盖情况。仅123例(21%)患者接受了全脑放疗,其中49例(40%)接受IRS-II方案治疗。
估计5年总生存率和无失败生存率分别为73%和69%。估计5年局部失败(LF)率为17%。随着更多横断面诊断影像的获取,ICE的检出率从24%增至41%。对于有任何脑膜侵犯体征的患者,诊断后<2周开始放疗(n = 315)的LF率为18%,而诊断后>2周开始放疗(n = 43)的LF率为33%(p = 0.03)。对于有ICE的患者,诊断后<2周开始放疗(n = 177)的LF率为16%,而诊断后>2周开始放疗(n = 19)的LF率为37%(p = 0.07)。对于有CNP和/或CBBE的患者,诊断后<2周开始放疗(n = 138)的LF率为21%,而诊断后>2周开始放疗(n = 23)的LF率为30%(p = 0.23)。在这些情况下,LF的增加均未对5年无失败生存率产生显著影响。局部失败后估计3年生存率为17%(95% CI,10%-25%)。对于没有脑膜侵犯体征的患者,放疗开始时间早于或晚于10周,局部控制情况无差异。III组大肿瘤(≥5 cm)患者若接受的剂量小于47.5 Gy,LF率为35%,而肿瘤较小且接受小于47.5 Gy剂量的患者LF率为18%,接受大于47.5 Gy剂量的患者LF率为15%,与肿瘤大小无关(p = 0.14)。没有证据表明全脑放疗会影响LF或降低中枢神经系统(CNS)复发率。对放疗参数和临床因素的多变量分析表明,放射剂量>47.5 Gy与较低的LF相关。ICE、CNP或CBBE的存在以及诊断时年龄>10岁与较高的局部失败率显著相关。
横断面诊断影像(CT或MRI)的获取改善了ICE的检出。对于有脑膜侵犯体征的患者,在诊断后2周内开始放疗与较低的局部失败率相关。当没有脑膜侵犯体征时,放疗延迟超过10周不会影响局部失败率。PM-RMS患者无需进行全脑放疗。至少47.5 Gy的剂量似乎与较低的局部失败率相关,尤其是当肿瘤直径≥5 cm时。