Sponsel William E, Paris Gianmarco, Trigo Yolanda, Pena Melanie, Weber Anke, Sanford Keith, McKinnon Stuart
South Texas Ocular Imaging Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Ophthalmology, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01286-7.
To assess, before and during oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug coadministration, latanoprost's and brimonidine's hypotensive action in eyes at risk of glaucomatous progression, assessing the effect of each drug on ocular perfusion and visual function.
Twenty consenting adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension underwent a double-masked, bilateral, randomized prospective study. Treatment started with either latanoprost 0.005% in the morning and placebo in the evening, or brimonidine 0.2% twice daily in one eye; after 1 week starting the other in the fellow eye. After another week, oral indomethacin 25 mg four times a day, commenced for 2 more weeks. Intraocular pressure, ocular circulation, and visual function were monitored pretreatment, after unilateral monotherapy (day 7), bilateral ocular therapy (day 14), and coadministered oral indomethacin (day 28). Intrasubject differences (interocular and intraocular relative to baseline) were determined by two-tailed paired t test.
A loss of the significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine was noted after oral indomethacin coadministration (-14%; P =.004 for brimonidine alone versus -11%; P =.3 with indomethacin). Significant intraocular pressure reduction with latanoprost persisted despite indomethacin (-25%; P <.0001 for latanoprost alone versus -30%; P <.0001 with indomethacin). Pulsatile ocular blood flow increased 40% with latanoprost, but was unchanged with brimonidine (interdrug difference, P =.004). Midperipheral retinal microcirculation increased 23% (P =.03) with latanoprost. Humphrey perimetry and contrast sensitivity remained consistently at or above baseline with both latanoprost and brimonidine. Indomethacin had no significant effect on ocular perfusion or visual function measures.
Circulatory and hydrodynamic findings differed substantially for the two drugs. The loss of significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine during indomethacin treatment may be clinically important.
在口服非甾体抗炎药联合使用之前及期间,评估拉坦前列素和溴莫尼定对有青光眼进展风险的眼睛的降压作用,评估每种药物对眼灌注和视觉功能的影响。
20名同意参与的开角型青光眼或高眼压症成年患者进行了一项双盲、双侧、随机前瞻性研究。治疗开始时,一只眼睛早上使用0.005%拉坦前列素,晚上使用安慰剂,或者每天两次使用0.2%溴莫尼定;1周后在另一只眼睛开始使用另一种药物。再过1周后,开始每天4次口服25毫克吲哚美辛,持续2周。在预处理、单侧单药治疗后(第7天)、双侧眼治疗后(第14天)以及联合口服吲哚美辛后(第28天)监测眼压、眼循环和视觉功能。通过双尾配对t检验确定受试者内差异(相对于基线的眼间和眼内差异)。
联合口服吲哚美辛后,溴莫尼定降低眼压的显著性丧失(-14%;单独使用溴莫尼定P = 0.004,联合吲哚美辛时为-11%;P = 0.3)。尽管联合使用了吲哚美辛,拉坦前列素仍持续显著降低眼压(-25%;单独使用拉坦前列素P < 0.0001,联合吲哚美辛时为-30%;P < 0.0001)。拉坦前列素使搏动性眼血流量增加40%,而溴莫尼定则无变化(药物间差异,P = 0.004)。拉坦前列素使视网膜中周部微循环增加23%(P = 0.03)。使用拉坦前列素和溴莫尼定后,汉弗莱视野检查和对比敏感度始终保持在基线或高于基线水平。吲哚美辛对眼灌注或视觉功能指标无显著影响。
两种药物的循环和流体动力学结果存在显著差异。吲哚美辛治疗期间溴莫尼定降低眼压显著性的丧失可能具有临床重要性。