de La Rocque L
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2001 Mar-Jun;8(1):10-34.
Throughout the ages, literary works have expressed fears and expectations generated by scientific discoveries and have portrayed images and myths about science itself. Several parameters can contribute to these representations of science, including the culture and social class to which the authors of these works belong. We also cannot deny the influence of gender, as due to the fact that the male sphere of action dominates science, male or female authoring can determine a peculiar characterization of the scientific world. In the present work, through a comparative analysis of two important literary works from the 19th century, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, and Dracula, by Bram Stoker, the issues concerning the view of science and their relation to gender are highlighted. While Shelley, as a woman, apart from the scientific world, reveals in Frankenstein all her distrust about it, Stoker, the model of a Victorian man, expresses in Dracula his total trust in science.
古往今来,文学作品表达了科学发现所引发的恐惧与期望,并描绘了有关科学本身的形象和神话。有几个因素会促成这些对科学的呈现,包括这些作品的作者所属的文化和社会阶层。我们也无法否认性别的影响,因为科学领域主要由男性主导,男性或女性创作会决定对科学世界的独特刻画。在本研究中,通过对19世纪两部重要文学作品——玛丽·雪莱的《弗兰肯斯坦》和布拉姆·斯托克的《德古拉》——进行比较分析,突出了有关科学观及其与性别的关系的问题。身为女性的雪莱,除了置身科学世界之外,在《弗兰肯斯坦》中展现了她对科学的所有不信任,而作为维多利亚时代男性典范的斯托克,在《德古拉》中表达了他对科学的完全信任。