Wang Y, Haynor D R, Kim Y
Rosetta Inpharmatics, Inc., Kirkland, WA 98034, USA.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001 Dec;48(12):1390-401. doi: 10.1109/10.966598.
Traditional impedance cardiography (ICG) technique uses band electrodes both for delivering current to and measuring impedance change in the thorax. The use of spot electrodes increases the ease of electrode placement and comfort level for patients. Research has shown that changes in thoracic impedance can have multiple causes. In this study, we used finite element modeling to investigate the sources of impedance change for both band-electrode and spot-electrode ICG, and focused on how differences in electrode location affect the contribution of different sources to changes in impedance. The ultimate purpose is to identify the optimal electrode type and placement for the sensing of stroke volume (SV). Our models were built on sets of end-diastolic and end-systolic magnetic resonance images of a healthy human subject. The results showed that the effect of ventricular contraction is opposite to that of the other changes in systole: the expansion of major vessels, decrease in blood resistivity due to increased blood flow velocity, and decrease in lung resistivity due to increased blood perfusion. Ventricular contraction, the only factor that tends to increase systolic impedance, has a larger effect than any of the other factors. When spot electrodes are placed on the anterior chest wall near the heart, ventricular contraction is so dominant that the measured impedance increases from end-diastole to end-systole, and the change represents 82% of the contribution from ventricular contraction. When using the common band-electrode configuration, the change in measured impedance is a more balanced combination of the four effects, and ventricular contraction is overcome by the other three factors so that the impedance decreases. These results suggest that the belief that ICG can be used to directly measure SV based on the change in the whole thoracic impedance may be invalid, and that spot electrodes may be more useful for understanding local physiological events such as ventricular volume change. These findings are supported by previously reported experimental observations.
传统的阻抗心动图(ICG)技术使用带状电极向胸部输送电流并测量胸部的阻抗变化。使用点状电极可提高电极放置的便利性和患者的舒适度。研究表明,胸部阻抗的变化可能有多种原因。在本研究中,我们使用有限元建模来研究带状电极和点状电极ICG的阻抗变化来源,并重点关注电极位置的差异如何影响不同来源对阻抗变化的贡献。最终目的是确定用于检测每搏输出量(SV)的最佳电极类型和放置位置。我们的模型基于一名健康人类受试者的舒张末期和收缩末期磁共振图像构建。结果表明,心室收缩的影响与收缩期的其他变化相反:主要血管的扩张、由于血流速度增加导致的血液电阻率降低以及由于血液灌注增加导致的肺电阻率降低。心室收缩是唯一倾向于增加收缩期阻抗的因素,其影响比任何其他因素都大。当点状电极放置在靠近心脏的前胸壁时,心室收缩占主导地位,以至于测量到的阻抗从舒张末期到收缩末期增加,并且该变化占心室收缩贡献的82%。当使用常见的带状电极配置时,测量到的阻抗变化是这四种效应的更平衡组合,并且心室收缩被其他三个因素克服,从而使阻抗降低。这些结果表明,认为ICG可基于整个胸部阻抗变化直接测量SV的观点可能是无效的,并且点状电极可能更有助于理解局部生理事件,如心室容积变化。这些发现得到了先前报道的实验观察结果的支持。