Long S H, Marquis M S
RAND, 1200 South Haves St., Arlington, VA 22202, USA.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):331-7. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.331.
Many policy initiatives to increase health insurance coverage would subsidize employers to offer coverage or subsidize employees to participate in their employers' health plans. Using data from the 1997 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Employer Health Insurance Survey, we contrast "low-wage employers" with all other employers. Employees in low-wage businesses have significantly worse access to employment-based insurance than other employees do; they are less likely to work for an employer that offers insurance, less likely to be eligible if working in a business that offers insurance, and less likely to be enrolled if eligible. Low-wage employers contribute lower shares of premiums and offer less generous benefits than other employers do. Policies that would target subsidies to selected employers to increase insurance offers to low-wage workers are difficult to design, however, because several commonly mentioned employer characteristics (including firm size) are found to be poor indicators of low-wage worker concentration. Programs that would set minimum standards for employer plans to be eligible for "buy-ins" need to base these standards on the less generous terms offered by low-wage employers in order to effectively reach low-wage workers and their dependents.
许多旨在扩大医疗保险覆盖范围的政策举措,要么会补贴雇主提供保险,要么会补贴员工参与雇主的健康计划。利用1997年罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会雇主健康保险调查的数据,我们将“低薪雇主”与其他所有雇主进行了对比。低薪企业的员工获得基于就业的保险的机会明显比其他员工差;他们为提供保险的雇主工作的可能性较小,如果在提供保险的企业工作,符合条件的可能性较小,符合条件后参保的可能性也较小。低薪雇主支付的保费份额较低,提供的福利也不如其他雇主慷慨。然而,旨在将补贴定向提供给特定雇主以增加对低薪工人保险供给的政策很难设计,因为人们发现,几个经常被提及的雇主特征(包括企业规模)并不能很好地表明低薪工人的集中程度。为雇主计划设定最低标准以使其有资格参与“吸纳参保”的项目,需要将这些标准建立在低薪雇主提供的较不慷慨的条款基础上,以便有效地覆盖低薪工人及其家属。