Hasegawa O, Matsumoto S, Gondo G, Wada N, Arita T
Medical Safety Support Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.
No To Shinkei. 2001 Nov;53(11):1015-9.
In Rochester diabetic neuropathy research by Dyck et al., abnormal value in two or more nerves was introduced into the nerve conduction criteria of diabetic neuropathy. Polyneuropathy index-revised(PNI-R) is calculated as the mean percentage of the normal of 8 parameters on the motor nerve conduction studies. They were motor nerve conduction velocities in the forearm or leg segment and F-wave latencies after wrist or ankle stimulation concerning to the median, ulnar, peroneal and posterior tibial nerves. F-wave latencies were adjusted to 160 cm height and used reciprocals in comparison with normal values. To compare these two indices, first we obtained the normal limit(1st or 99th percentile value) of each parameter from the data of 62 healthy individuals. Then in 78 patients with diabetes mellitus number of abnormal nerves and the PNI-R were investigated. Abnormal values were frequently observed in the categories of motor nerve conduction velocities and F-wave latencies. Amplitude of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) or sensory nerve action potential(SNAP) in each nerve had a large standard deviation. In such parameters abnormal rate was extremely low, because the lower limit of normal being very small. Nevertheless, sigma CMAP which means the summation of amplitudes of 3 CMAPs had as high as 53% of abnormal rate. The coefficient of correlation between number of abnormal nerves and the value of PNI-R mounted up to -0.87. Instead, the coefficient of correlation of sigma CMAP or sigma SNAP, which means the summation of amplitudes of ulnar and sural SNAPs, with PNI-R were 0.65 and 0.79, respectively. In 14 patients PNI-R was normal and the number of abnormal nerves was 0 or 1. In 59 both categories were abnormal, and only in 5 they were not coincide. As to the clinical signs PNI-R had better correlation than number of abnormal nerves with vibration threshold or degree of Achilles tendon reflex. sigma CMAP is a convenient index to detect the existence and the degree of neuropathy. This index expresses the degree of neurogenic muscular atrophy, though it doesn't always advance parallel to the decrease in number of motor nerves. sigma SNAP had higher coefficient of correlation with PNI-R or number of abnormal nerves than sigma CMAP. In conclusion, abnormal PNI-R and abnormal value in two or more nerves are both useful and coincide with each other in the detection of diabetic neuropathy. The PNI-R is an excellent quantitative index, and the PNI-R corresponds well with the number of abnormal nerves. These observations indicate that the number of nerves with abnormal value is also available as a simple and semi-quantitative index of diabetic neuropathy.
在戴克等人进行的罗切斯特糖尿病神经病变研究中,糖尿病神经病变的神经传导标准引入了两条或更多神经的异常值。修订后的多神经病变指数(PNI-R)通过运动神经传导研究中8项参数的正常均值百分比来计算。这些参数是前臂或腿部节段的运动神经传导速度,以及针对正中神经、尺神经、腓总神经和胫后神经的腕部或踝部刺激后的F波潜伏期。F波潜伏期根据身高160厘米进行调整,并采用倒数与正常值进行比较。为比较这两个指标,我们首先从62名健康个体的数据中获取每个参数的正常极限(第1或第99百分位数)。然后对78例糖尿病患者的异常神经数量和PNI-R进行了研究。运动神经传导速度和F波潜伏期类别中经常观察到异常值。每条神经的复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)或感觉神经动作电位(SNAP)的幅度标准差较大。在这些参数中,异常率极低,因为正常下限非常小。然而,3个CMAP幅度总和的sigma CMAP异常率高达53%。异常神经数量与PNI-R值之间的相关系数高达-0.87。相反,尺神经和腓肠神经SNAP幅度总和的sigma CMAP或sigma SNAP与PNI-R的相关系数分别为0.65和0.79。14例患者PNI-R正常且异常神经数量为0或1。59例患者这两项指标均异常,仅5例不相符。关于临床体征,PNI-R与振动阈值或跟腱反射程度的相关性优于异常神经数量。sigma CMAP是检测神经病变存在和程度的便捷指标。该指标虽不总是与运动神经数量的减少平行进展,但可反映神经源性肌肉萎缩程度。sigma SNAP与PNI-R或异常神经数量的相关系数高于sigma CMAP。总之,异常的PNI-R和两条或更多神经的异常值在糖尿病神经病变检测中均有用且相互吻合。PNI-R是一个优秀的定量指标,且与异常神经数量高度相符。这些观察结果表明,具有异常值的神经数量也可作为糖尿病神经病变的简单半定量指标。