Janda Katarzyna, Stompór Tomasz, Gryz Elzbieta, Szczudlik Andrzej, Drozdz Maciej, Kraśniak Andrzej, Sułowicz Władysław
Katedra i Klinika Nefrologii UJ CM, Kraków.
Przegl Lek. 2007;64(6):423-30.
The aim of the study was to assess severity of injury of the peripheral nervous system of chronic renal failure patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) diagnosed based on the electrophysiological testing as well as to establish the effect of adequate dialysis dose on peripheral nerve functioning. The study was performed in 53 patients (21 males, 32 females) on CAPD for mean 16.9 +/- 14.4 months and 68 patients (46 males, 22 females) on HD for mean 47.5 +/- 46.5 months. Both groups were age matched (48.9 +/- 12.4 vs. 50.6 +/- 11.9 yrs; p= NS). Patients with co-existing diseases that could lead to disturbances in nerve conduction were excluded from the study group.
Electrophysiological testing was performed using Medelec Shaphire 2ME equipment. Nerve conductivity testing was performed in motor and sensory fibres of right ulnar nerve, motor fibres of right fibular nerve and left tibial nerve as well as in sensory fibres of right calf nerve. In the sensory nerves there were assessed: amplitude of the evoked sensory response, latency of the response and conduction velocity. In the motor nerves there were analyzed amplitude of the compound muscle action potential, latency of the evoked response, F-wave minimal latency and conduction velocity. Polyneuropathy was diagnosed if abnormal results obtained in electrophysiological examination were found in at least two out of four tested nerves. To assess dialysis adequacy in the CAPD group weekly Kt/V (wKt/ V) and weekly creatinine clearance (WCrCI) were used and in the HD patients the following indices were measured: Kt/V, PRU, TAC and TAD.
Polyneuropathy diagnosed based on the above described criteria, was found in 59 (86.8%) HD patients and in 41 (77.4%) CAPD patients (p= NS). The results of motor conductivity testing showed significantly longer distal latency in HD patients in comparison to the CAPD patients in fibular nerve (4.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 4.5 +/- 0.8 ms; p< 0.05) and F-wave latency in ulnar nerve (29.3 +/- 3.1 vs. 27.3 +/- 2.5 ms; p< 0.05), in fibular nerve (52.4 +/- 6.4 vs. 48.5 +/- 7.94 ms; p< 0.05), in tibial nerve (54.8 +/- 7.8 vs. 50.6 +/- 7.12 ms; p< 0.05) and also significantly lower conduction velocity in ulnar nerve (51.9 +/- 5.9 vs. 55.6 +/- 6.99 m/s; p< 0.05), in fibular nerve (41.2 +/- 5.9 vs. 44.5 +/- 5.5 m/s; p< 0.05), in tibial nerve (40.1 +/- 5.81 vs. 42.7 +/- 4.6 m/s; p< 0.05). Mean value of sensory response amplitude evoked in ulnar nerve was significantly higher in the CAPD treated patients than in HD patients (21.2 +/- 14.8 vs. 15.1 +/- 11.4 microV; p< 0.05) and distal latency in calf nerve was significantly shorter (2.1 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.6 ms; p< 0.05). Analysing the effect of dialysis on peripheral nerve functioning in the group of CAPD patients a statistically significant relationship between the severity of peripheral nerve injury and WCrCl was demonstrated. Mean value of WCrCl in patients without features of neuropathy was significantly higher (83.3 +/- 28.98 l/week/ 1.73m2) in comparison with those with diagnosed polyneuropathy (59.9 +/- 15.9 l/week/1.73m2) (p< 0.01). Analyzing effect of WCrCl on conduction velocity in the tested nerves there was demonstrated that in patients with WCrCl value at least 60 l/week/1.73m2, mean velocity values were higher, and the statistically significant difference was found for sensory (p< 0.05) and motor (p< 0.01) fibers of ulnar nerve. Mean value of residual renal clearance in the CAPD treated patients without features of sensory and motor nerve injury was significantly higher (2.9 +/- 1.8 ml/min) when compared to the patients with diagnosed polyneuropathy (1.4 +/- 1.3 ml/min) (p= 0.006). In the hemodialyzed group no statistically significant relationship was found between conduction velocity in the tested nerves and indices of dialysis efficiency (Kt/V, PRU) as well as degree of exposure to uremic toxemia described by TAC and TAD.
Polyneuropathy is a common complication in patients with chronic renal failure independently of a kind of the therapy. Well preserved residual renal function in CAPD patients plays an important role in improving effectiveness of the dialytic treatment, in consequence influencing preservation of proper peripheral nerve function.
本研究旨在评估基于电生理测试诊断的持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)或维持性血液透析(HD)的慢性肾衰竭患者外周神经系统的损伤严重程度,并确定适当透析剂量对周围神经功能的影响。该研究纳入了53例接受CAPD治疗的患者(21例男性,32例女性),平均治疗时间为16.9±14.4个月,以及68例接受HD治疗的患者(46例男性,22例女性),平均治疗时间为47.5±46.5个月。两组患者年龄匹配(48.9±12.4岁与50.6±11.9岁;p=无显著差异)。研究组排除了存在可能导致神经传导障碍的合并疾病的患者。
使用Medelec Shaphire 2ME设备进行电生理测试。对右侧尺神经的运动和感觉纤维、右侧腓总神经和左侧胫神经的运动纤维以及右侧腓肠神经的感觉纤维进行神经传导测试。在感觉神经中评估:诱发感觉反应的幅度、反应潜伏期和传导速度。在运动神经中分析复合肌肉动作电位的幅度、诱发反应的潜伏期、F波最小潜伏期和传导速度。如果在四条测试神经中的至少两条神经的电生理检查中获得异常结果,则诊断为多发性神经病。为了评估CAPD组的透析充分性,使用每周Kt/V(wKt/V)和每周肌酐清除率(WCrCI),在HD患者中测量以下指标:Kt/V、PRU、TAC和TAD。
根据上述标准诊断的多发性神经病在59例(86.8%)HD患者和41例(77.4%)CAPD患者中被发现(p=无显著差异)。运动传导测试结果显示,与CAPD患者相比,HD患者在腓总神经中的远端潜伏期显著延长(4.9±0.9 vs. 4.5±0.8 ms;p<0.05),在尺神经中的F波潜伏期显著延长(29.3±3.1 vs. 27.3±2.5 ms;p<0.05),在腓总神经中(52.4±6.4 vs. 48.5±7.94 ms;p<0.05),在胫神经中(54.8±7.8 vs. 50.6±7.12 ms;p<0.05),并且在尺神经中的传导速度显著降低(51.9±5.9 vs. 55.6±6.99 m/s;p<0.05),在腓总神经中(41.2±5.9 vs. 44.5±5.5 m/s;p<0.05),在胫神经中(40.1±5.81 vs. 42.7±4.6 m/s;p<0.05)。CAPD治疗患者尺神经诱发的感觉反应幅度平均值显著高于HD患者(21.2±14.8 vs. 15.1±11.4 μV;p<0.05),腓肠神经的远端潜伏期显著缩短(2.1±1.0 vs. 2.4±0.6 ms;p<0.05)。分析透析对CAPD患者组周围神经功能的影响,结果显示周围神经损伤严重程度与WCrCl之间存在统计学显著关系。无神经病变特征的患者的WCrCl平均值显著高于诊断为多发性神经病的患者(83.3±28.98 l/周/1.73m²)(59.9±15.9 l/周/1.73m²)(p<0.01)。分析WCrCl对测试神经传导速度的影响,结果表明WCrCl值至少为60 l/周/1.73m²的患者,平均速度值更高,并且在尺神经的感觉(p<0.05)和运动(p<0.01)纤维中发现了统计学显著差异。与诊断为多发性神经病的患者(1.4±1.3 ml/min)相比,无感觉和运动神经损伤特征的CAPD治疗患者的残余肾清除率平均值显著更高(2.9±1.8 ml/min)(p=0.006)。在血液透析组中,测试神经的传导速度与透析效率指标(Kt/V、PRU)以及由TAC和TAD描述的尿毒症毒素血症暴露程度之间未发现统计学显著关系。
多发性神经病是慢性肾衰竭患者的常见并发症,与治疗方式无关。CAPD患者保留良好的残余肾功能在提高透析治疗效果方面起着重要作用,从而影响周围神经功能的维持。