Saporito R A, Boneta A R, Feldman C A, Cinotti W, Sintes J L, Stewart B, Volpe A R, Proskin H M
New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, USA.
Am J Dent. 2000 Aug;13(4):221-6.
To provide a head-to-head comparison of the anticaries efficacy associated with two commercially-available and American Dental Association-accepted dentifrices: Crest Cavity Fighting Toothpaste with Fluoristat, containing 0.243% sodium fluoride in a silica base, and Colgate Great Regular Flavor Fluoride Toothpaste, containing 0.76% sodium monofluorophosphate in a dicalcium phosphate dihydrate base. The study was conducted in harmony with the published 1988 American Dental Association guidelines for studies geared toward this purpose.
The study employed a double-blind, parallel-groups, multi-center two-treatment design, and involved third, fourth, and fifth grade schoolchildren from Newark, New Jersey, and from the Cidra and Lares areas of Puerto Rico. Qualifying subjects were stratified according to age and sex, and were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups, with multiple subjects in the same household all assigned to the dentifrice randomly allocated to the first among them. Caries examinations were conducted in accordance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines for the clinical evaluation of drugs to prevent dental caries. After treatment assignment, study participants were instructed to brush their teeth at home with their assigned dentifrice at least twice daily. Brushing instructions were reinforced by the presentation of educational films and lectures at school, by semi-annual mailings to parents, and through the periodic distribution of small novelty gifts along with the dentifrice deliveries, in order to enhance the interest and enthusiasm of study participants. Post-baseline examinations were performed after 1 and after 2 yrs of product use. Two thousand four hundred seventy-nine (2,479) subjects completed this 2-yr study. For these subjects, the mean (S.D.) DFS scores at baseline were 2.77 (3.35) for the Crest group, and 2.66 (3.18) for the Colgate group. For caries increment after 1 yr, the respective means were 1.68 (2.53) and 1.70 (2.57). After 2 yrs, the mean caries increments were 3.56 (4.11) for the Crest group, and 3.56 (4.05) for the Colgate group.
The analysis of the 2-yr caries increment scores support the conclusion that the anticaries efficacy associated with Colgate Great Regular Flavor Fluoride Toothpaste is equivalent to that associated with Crest Cavity Fighting Toothpaste with Fluoristat, in accordance with the procedures and standards provided by the published guidelines of the American Dental Association. Further, consistent with those same standards, the results of this study serve to lend additional support to the conclusion that dentifrices formulated with sodium monofluorophosphate provide an equivalent level of anticaries efficacy as to those formulated with sodium fluoride.
对两种市售且获得美国牙科协会认可的牙膏进行直接对比,以评估其防龋功效:含氟斯特(Fluoristat)的佳洁士防蛀牙膏,其二氧化硅基质中含0.243%的氟化钠;以及高露洁常规薄荷味含氟牙膏,其二水磷酸二钙基质中含0.76%的单氟磷酸钠。该研究是依据1988年美国牙科协会发布的针对此目的研究的指南进行的。
本研究采用双盲、平行组、多中心双处理设计,涉及来自新泽西州纽瓦克市以及波多黎各锡德拉和拉雷斯地区的三、四、五年级小学生。符合条件的受试者按年龄和性别分层,随机分配至两个处理组,同一家庭中的多名受试者都被随机分配至该家庭中第一个被随机分配的牙膏组。龋病检查按照美国食品药品监督管理局关于预防龋齿药物临床评估的指南进行。在进行处理分配后,研究参与者被指示在家中每天至少用分配的牙膏刷牙两次。通过在学校播放教育影片和举办讲座、每半年给家长邮寄信件以及在每次发放牙膏时定期分发小礼品等方式强化刷牙指导,以提高研究参与者的兴趣和积极性。在产品使用1年和2年后进行基线后检查。2479名受试者完成了这项为期2年的研究。对于这些受试者,基线时佳洁士组的平均(标准差)DFS得分是2.77(3.35),高露洁组是2.66(3.18)。1年后龋病增量的各自均值分别为1.68(2.53)和1.70(2.57)。2年后,佳洁士组的平均龋病增量为3.56(4.11),高露洁组为3.56(4.05)。
对2年龋病增量得分的分析支持以下结论:按照美国牙科协会发布指南所提供的程序和标准,高露洁常规薄荷味含氟牙膏的防龋功效与含氟斯特的佳洁士防蛀牙膏相当。此外,与这些标准一致,本研究结果进一步支持以下结论:含单氟磷酸钠配方的牙膏与含氟化钠配方的牙膏具有同等水平的防龋功效。