• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字减影血管造影、CT血管造影和超声多普勒检查在阴茎动脉病变评估中的比较

[Comparison of digital subtraction angiography, CT angiography, and ultrasonic Doppler examination in the evaluation of penile arterial lesions].

作者信息

Kawanisi Y, Kimura K, Lee K S, Koizumi T, Nakatsuji H, Kojima K, Yamamoto A, Numata A

机构信息

Department of Urology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital.

出版信息

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2001 Nov;92(7):674-81. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.92.674.

DOI:10.5980/jpnjurol1989.92.674
PMID:11766366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

CT angiography reconstructed by a multidetector-row helical CT scanner is a newly developed form of imaging. We compared CT angiography and ultrasonic Doppler examination with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the diagnosis of arterial lesion.

METHOD

Eighteen patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) underwent color Doppler study, DSA, and CT angiography after providing informed consent. The CT angiography images were obtained by a multidetector-row helical CT scanner, Asteion TSX021A (TOSHIBA). We injected prostaglandin E1 into the penile cavernous body, and then rapidly infused nonionic contrast medium into the antecubital vein. DSA and CT angiography images of the bilateral internal pudendal arteries and cavernous arteries were examined for stenotic lesions or occlusion. We also compared the peak systolic blood flow velocity in the cavernous artery measured by color Doppler ultrasound with CT angiography and DSA.

RESULTS

The CT angiography and color Doppler studies were performed on an outpatient basis, but DSA required hospitalization. In the 36 internal pudendal arteries, DSA represented 22 normal arteries and 14 stenosis or occlusions. CT angiography showed 15 normal arteries and 21 occlusions. For the diagnosis of stenosis or occlusion in the internal pudendal artery, the CT angiography image had a good agreement, with a sensitivity of 1.00, specificity of 0.68, and accuracy of 0.81. For diagnosis in the cavernous artery, CT angiography image also showed a good agreement with DSA; however, the quality of the images of fine arteries was better in the DSA images. The inferior view and internal view of the pelvis in CT angiography were helpful for visualizing the internal pudendal artery, especially at the pubic bone. There was insufficient correlation between peak systolic blood flow velocity and DSA findings. There were no serious complications involved in either examination.

CONCLUSIONS

CT angiography has not yet reached the same level as DSA in the evaluation of fine arteries. However, CT angiography can produced images sufficient for the diagnosis of arteriogenic ED with some advantages. We believe that with improvement, CT angiography will become an adequate replacement for DSA in the diagnosis of penile arterisl lesion.

摘要

背景

多层螺旋CT扫描仪重建的CT血管造影是一种新开发的成像形式。我们比较了CT血管造影、超声多普勒检查和数字减影血管造影(DSA)在诊断动脉病变中的应用。

方法

18例动脉性勃起功能障碍(ED)患者在签署知情同意书后接受了彩色多普勒检查、DSA和CT血管造影。CT血管造影图像由多层螺旋CT扫描仪Asteion TSX021A(东芝)获取。我们将前列腺素E1注入阴茎海绵体,然后将非离子型造影剂快速注入肘前静脉。检查双侧阴部内动脉和海绵体动脉的DSA和CT血管造影图像,以查找狭窄病变或闭塞情况。我们还比较了彩色多普勒超声测量的海绵体动脉收缩期峰值血流速度与CT血管造影和DSA的结果。

结果

CT血管造影和彩色多普勒检查可在门诊进行,但DSA需要住院。在36条阴部内动脉中,DSA显示22条动脉正常,14条有狭窄或闭塞。CT血管造影显示15条动脉正常,21条有闭塞。对于阴部内动脉狭窄或闭塞的诊断,CT血管造影图像具有良好的一致性,敏感性为1.00,特异性为0.68,准确性为0.81。对于海绵体动脉的诊断,CT血管造影图像与DSA也显示出良好的一致性;然而,DSA图像中细小动脉的图像质量更好。CT血管造影中骨盆的下视图和内视图有助于观察阴部内动脉,尤其是在耻骨处。收缩期峰值血流速度与DSA结果之间的相关性不足。两种检查均未出现严重并发症。

结论

在细小动脉评估方面,CT血管造影尚未达到DSA的水平。然而,CT血管造影能够生成足以诊断动脉性ED的图像,且具有一些优势。我们相信,随着技术的改进,CT血管造影将成为诊断阴茎动脉病变时DSA的合适替代方法。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of digital subtraction angiography, CT angiography, and ultrasonic Doppler examination in the evaluation of penile arterial lesions].数字减影血管造影、CT血管造影和超声多普勒检查在阴茎动脉病变评估中的比较
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2001 Nov;92(7):674-81. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.92.674.
2
Feasibility of multi-slice computed tomography in the diagnosis of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.多层螺旋计算机断层扫描在动脉性勃起功能障碍诊断中的可行性
BJU Int. 2001 Sep;88(4):390-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02316.x.
3
[Selective internal pudendal arteriography in the diagnosis of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction].[选择性阴部内动脉造影在动脉源性勃起功能障碍诊断中的应用]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2019 Dec;25(12):1083-1087.
4
Lesion Pattern in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction of Suspected Arterial Origin: An Angiographic Study.疑似动脉源性勃起功能障碍患者的病变模式:一项血管造影研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Feb;23(1):76-82. doi: 10.1177/1526602815613789. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
5
Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.50例连续性患者肾动脉狭窄的多排螺旋CT血管造影:与数字减影血管造影的前瞻性观察者间比较
Radiol Med. 2006 Apr;111(3):459-68. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0042-3. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
6
Radiologic anatomy of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction: a systematized approach.动脉源性勃起功能障碍的放射解剖学:一种系统化方法
Acta Med Port. 2013 May-Jun;26(3):219-25. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
7
The measurement of stenosis of the internal carotid artery: comparison of doppler ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography and the 3D CT volume rendering technique.颈内动脉狭窄的测量:多普勒超声、数字减影血管造影术与三维CT容积再现技术的比较
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004;116 Suppl 2:51-5.
8
[Transperineal ultrasound imaging of the internal pudendal artery in arteriogenic erectile dysfunction].[经会阴超声成像评估阴部内动脉在动脉源性勃起功能障碍中的情况]
Urologiia. 2017 Sep(4):55-61.
9
Penile revascularization surgery for arteriogenic erectile dysfunction: the long-term efficacy rate calculated by survival analysis.动脉源性勃起功能障碍的阴茎血管重建手术:通过生存分析计算的长期有效率
BJU Int. 2004 Aug;94(3):361-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04867.x.
10
Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.采用16排CT血管造影术评估腹主动脉髂动脉及下肢动脉:与数字减影血管造影术的前瞻性比较
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):1083-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2362040895. Epub 2005 Jul 29.