Suppr超能文献

赖脯胰岛素与人常规胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病伴口服降糖药继发失效患者的对比研究

A comparative study of insulin lispro and human regular insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents.

作者信息

Ross S A, Zinman B, Campos R V, Strack T

机构信息

University of Calgary, Alta.

出版信息

Clin Invest Med. 2001 Dec;24(6):292-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of insulin lispro (LP) and human regular insulin (HR) when given twice daily with NPH insulin on glycemic control (HbA1c), daily blood glucose profiles and rates of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after failure to respond to sulfonylurea drugs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A 5.5-month randomized, open-label, parallel study of 148 patients receiving either LP (n = 70) or HR (n = 78). Eight-point blood glucose profiles and HbA1c measurements were collected at baseline, 1.5, 3.5 and 5.5 months.

RESULTS

Two-hour post-breakfast and 2-hour post-supper blood glucose levels (means [and standard errors]) were significantly lower for LP than for HR at the end point (9.5 [0.4] mmol/L v. 10.9 [0.4] mmol/L and 8.4 [0.4] mmol/L v. 9.7 [0.4] mmol/L, respectively, p = 0.02 in both cases). HbA1c improved from 10.5% (0.2%) (LP) and 10.3% (0.2%) (HR) to 8.0% (0.1%). Hypoglycemia rates were similar during the day; however, there was an overnight trend to reduced rates with LP (0.08 [0.03] episodes/30 d v. 0.16 [0.04] episodes/30 d, p = 0.057). Quality-of life assessment showed significant improvement (p < 0.05) in the diabetes-related worry scale for LP subjects whereas HR subjects slightly worsened.

CONCLUSIONS

With traditional twice-daily insulin administration algorithms, LP improves 2-hour postprandial glucose levels, quality of life and overnight hypoglycemia rates while delivering an equivalent level of glycemic control (HbA1c) compared with HR to insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes who require insulin.

摘要

目的

比较赖脯胰岛素(LP)和人常规胰岛素(HR)每日两次联合中性精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)治疗对磺脲类药物治疗无效的2型糖尿病患者血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c])、每日血糖谱及低血糖发生率的影响。

研究设计与方法

一项为期5.5个月的随机、开放标签、平行研究,纳入148例患者,其中70例接受LP治疗,78例接受HR治疗。在基线、1.5、3.5和5.5个月时收集八点血糖谱和HbA1c测量值。

结果

终点时,LP组早餐后2小时和晚餐后2小时血糖水平(均值[及标准误])显著低于HR组(分别为9.5[0.4]mmol/L对10.9[0.4]mmol/L和8.4[0.4]mmol/L对9.7[0.4]mmol/L,两种情况p均=0.02)。HbA1c从LP组的10.5%(0.2%)和HR组的10.3%(0.2%)改善至8.0%(0.1%)。白天低血糖发生率相似;然而,LP组夜间低血糖发生率有降低趋势(0.08[0.03]次/30天对0.16[0.04]次/30天,p=0.057)。生活质量评估显示,LP组患者糖尿病相关担忧量表有显著改善(p<0.05),而HR组患者略有恶化。

结论

采用传统的每日两次胰岛素给药方案,与HR相比,LP可改善初治需胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的餐后2小时血糖水平、生活质量及夜间低血糖发生率,同时实现同等程度的血糖控制(HbA1c)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验