Vaes P, Van Gheluwe B, Duquet W
Physical Therapy Department, Physical Education & Physical Therapy and Medicine Faculties, Brussels University, Belgium.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Dec;31(12):741-52. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.12.741.
Comparative study of differences in functional control during ankle supination in the standing position in matched stable and unstable ankles (ex post facto design).
To document acceleration and deceleration during ankle supination in the standing position and to determine differences in control of supination perturbation between stable and unstable ankles.
Repetitive ankle sprain can be explained by mechanical instability only in a minority of cases. Exercise therapy for ankle instability is based on clinical experience. Joint stability has not yet been measured in dynamic situations that are similar to the situations leading to a traumatic sprain. The process of motor control during accelerating ankle supination has not been adequately addressed in the literature.
Patients with complaints of ankle instability (16 unstable ankles) and nonimpaired controls (18 stable ankles) were examined (N = 17 subjects, 10 women and 7 men). The average age was 23.7 +/- 5.0 years (range, 20-41 y). Control of supination speed was studied during 50 degrees of ankle supination in the standing position using accelerometry (total supination time and deceleration times) and electromyography (latency time). Timing of motor response was estimated by measuring electromechanical delay.
The presence of an early, sudden, and presumably passive slowdown of ankle supination in the standing position was observed. Peroneal muscle motor response was detected before the end of the supination. Unstable ankles showed significantly shorter total supination time (109.3 ms versus 124.1 ms) and significantly longer latency time (58.9 ms versus 47.7 ms).
Functional control in unstable ankles is less efficient in decelerating the ankle during the supination test procedures used in our study. Our conclusions are based on significantly faster total supination and significantly slower electromyogram response in unstable ankles. The results support the hypothesis that both decelerating the total supination movement during balance disturbance and enhancing the speed of evertor activation through exercise can be specific therapy goals.
对匹配的稳定和不稳定踝关节在站立位进行踝关节旋后时功能控制差异的比较研究(事后设计)。
记录站立位踝关节旋后时的加速和减速情况,并确定稳定和不稳定踝关节在旋后扰动控制方面的差异。
重复性踝关节扭伤仅在少数情况下可由机械性不稳定解释。踝关节不稳定的运动疗法基于临床经验。在与导致创伤性扭伤的情况相似的动态情境中,关节稳定性尚未得到测量。文献中尚未充分探讨加速踝关节旋后时的运动控制过程。
对主诉踝关节不稳定的患者(16个不稳定踝关节)和无损伤对照者(18个稳定踝关节)进行检查(N = 17名受试者,10名女性和7名男性)。平均年龄为23.7±5.0岁(范围20 - 41岁)。使用加速度计(总旋后时间和减速时间)和肌电图(潜伏期)研究站立位踝关节旋后50度时旋后速度的控制情况。通过测量机电延迟来估计运动反应的时间。
观察到站立位踝关节旋后存在早期、突然且可能是被动的减速。在旋后结束前检测到腓骨肌运动反应。不稳定踝关节的总旋后时间显著缩短(109.3毫秒对124.1毫秒),潜伏期显著延长(58.9毫秒对47.7毫秒)。
在我们研究中使用的旋后测试程序中,不稳定踝关节在使踝关节减速方面的功能控制效率较低。我们的结论基于不稳定踝关节的总旋后明显更快且肌电图反应明显更慢。结果支持这样的假设,即在平衡干扰期间使总旋后运动减速以及通过运动提高外翻肌激活速度都可以是特定的治疗目标。