Suppr超能文献

外科手术抗生素预防:对术后感染的影响

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: effect in postoperative infections.

作者信息

Fernández A H, Monge V, Garcinuño M A

机构信息

Hospital Santa Bárbara, Servicio De Medicina Preventiva, Puertollano, Ciudad Real, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(4):369-74. doi: 10.1023/a:1012794330908.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to assess the risk of surgical wound infection and hospital acquired infections among patients with and without adequate antibiotic prophylaxis. Also, to provide models to predict the contributing factors of hospital infection and surgical wound infection.

DESIGN

survey study. Prospective cohort study over 14 months, with data collected by a nurse and a epidemiologist through visits to the surgical areas, a review of the medical record and consultation with the medical doctor and nurses attending the patients.

SETTING

Two hundred and fifty bed, general hospital serving Puertollano (Ciudad Real), population--50,000.

RESULTS

between February 1998 and April 1999, 754 patients underwent surgery, 263 (34.88%) received appropriate perioperative prophylaxis while 491 (65.12%) received inadequate prophylaxis. For those who received adequate antibiotic prophylaxis, the percentage of nosocomial infection was 10.65% compared with the group who received inadequate prophylaxis in which the percentage of nosocomial infection was 33.40%. The relative risk of nosocomial infection was, therefore, 4.21 times higher in the latter group (confidence intervals 95%: 2.71-6.51). A patient in the inadequate prophylaxis group had a 14.87% chance of wound infection while a patient in the adequate prophylaxis group had a 4.56% chance of wound infection. The relative risk of wound infection was 3.65 times higher in the group that received inadequate prophylaxis (confidence intervals 95%: 1.95-6.86). The final regression logistic model to assess nosocomial infection incorporated seven prognostic factors: age, length of venous periferic route, vesicle catheter, duration of operation, obesity, metabolic or neoplasm diseases and adequate or inadequate prophylaxis. When we incorporated these variables in the multi-factorial analysis we found that the relative risk of developing nosocomial infection was 2.33 times higher in the group which received inadequate prophylaxis. When we applied the second logistic multiple regression model (wound infection), we discovered that the probability of developing surgical wound infection was 2.32 times higher in the group which received inadequate prophylaxis as opposed to the group, which received adequate prophylaxis. The goodness of fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) showed a correct significance in all models.

CONCLUSIONS

a multi-factorial analysis was applied to identify the high-risk patients and the risk factors for postoperative infections. Through the application of these multiple regression logistic models, we conclude that the correct antibiotic prophylaxis is effective and will subsequently reduce postoperative infection rates, especially in high-risk patients. Therefore, the choice of antimicrobial agent should be made on the basis of the criteria of hospital committee.

摘要

目的

评估接受和未接受充分抗生素预防的患者手术伤口感染及医院获得性感染的风险。同时,提供预测医院感染和手术伤口感染影响因素的模型。

设计

调查研究。为期14个月的前瞻性队列研究,由一名护士和一名流行病学家通过走访手术区域、查阅病历以及与照料患者的医生和护士会诊来收集数据。

地点

位于普埃托利亚诺(雷阿尔城)的一家拥有250张床位的综合医院,人口5万。

结果

1998年2月至1999年4月期间,754例患者接受了手术,263例(34.88%)接受了适当的围手术期预防,而491例(65.12%)接受的预防不充分。接受充分抗生素预防的患者中,医院感染率为10.65%,而接受预防不充分的患者组中,医院感染率为33.40%。因此,后一组医院感染的相对风险高出4.21倍(95%置信区间:2.71 - 6.51)。预防不充分组的患者伤口感染几率为14.87%,而预防充分组的患者伤口感染几率为4.56%。预防不充分组伤口感染的相对风险高出3.65倍(95%置信区间:1.95 - 6.86)。评估医院感染的最终回归逻辑模型纳入了七个预后因素:年龄、外周静脉通路长度、膀胱导管、手术时长、肥胖、代谢或肿瘤疾病以及预防充分与否。当我们将这些变量纳入多因素分析时,发现预防不充分组发生医院感染的相对风险高出2.33倍。当我们应用第二个逻辑多元回归模型(伤口感染)时,发现预防不充分组发生手术伤口感染的概率比预防充分组高出2.32倍。拟合优度(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验)在所有模型中均显示出正确的显著性。

结论

应用多因素分析来识别高危患者和术后感染的风险因素。通过应用这些多元回归逻辑模型,我们得出结论,正确的抗生素预防是有效的,随后将降低术后感染率,尤其是在高危患者中。因此,抗菌药物的选择应基于医院委员会的标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验