Gershenson D M
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
Cancer J. 2001 Nov-Dec;7(6):450-7.
American women are not receiving state-of-the-art gynecologic cancer care. The three most common gynecologic cancers-endometrial, ovarian, and cervical-are quite uncommon in the United States when compared with othermalignancies. Nevertheless, their importance is clearly out of proportion to their incidence since the annual death rate from ovarian cancer alone is about one third that of breast cancer. And cervical cancer is a very common malignancy of women worldwide. The major problem accounting for suboptimal treatment of ovarian and endometrial cancers in the United States is incomplete surgical staging performed by nongynecologic oncologists. In the case of cervical cancer treatment, suboptimal care is attributable to specialty territoriality and the lack of randomized data. Factors influencing substandard gynecologic cancer for American women include the following: (1) the unregulated nature of the American health care system, (2) failure of professional education related to training in surgical principles and techniques and referral practices, (3) inadequate interactions between subspecialists and referring physicians, (4) disincentives for physicians to refer patients out of managed care networks or group practices, (5) disagreements between clinicians representing competing disciplines, and (6) conflicts of interest on the part of academic physicians or cooperative groups. Recommended initiatives include the following: (1) embracingthe quality of patient care as the overarching principle; (2) designing clinical trials that lead to advances in patient outcomes; (3) emphasizing public education (direct consumer information) as well as professional education; (4) partnering with local, state, and national patient advocacy groups to ensure optimal treatment for gynecologic cancers; (5) implementing practice guidelines; (6) developing referral guidelines; (7) improving communication skills of academic physicians in relating to referring physicians; (8) continuing to conduct and publish outcomes studies; and (9) establishing centers of excellence. It is time to make a commitment to substantially improving gynecologic cancer care for American women, and, I believe, the proposed initiatives will begin to accomplish this essential goal.
美国女性并未得到最先进的妇科癌症护理。与其他恶性肿瘤相比,三种最常见的妇科癌症——子宫内膜癌、卵巢癌和宫颈癌——在美国并不常见。然而,它们的重要性与其发病率明显不相称,因为仅卵巢癌的年死亡率就约为乳腺癌的三分之一。而且宫颈癌是全球女性中非常常见的恶性肿瘤。在美国,导致卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌治疗不充分的主要问题是由非妇科肿瘤学家进行的手术分期不完整。就宫颈癌治疗而言,护理不充分归因于专业领域划分以及缺乏随机数据。影响美国女性妇科癌症护理不达标的因素包括以下几点:(1)美国医疗保健系统的无监管性质;(2)与手术原则和技术培训以及转诊实践相关的专业教育不足;(3)专科医生与转诊医生之间的互动不足;(4)医生将患者转出管理式医疗网络或团体诊所的激励措施不足;(5)代表相互竞争学科的临床医生之间的分歧;(6)学术医生或合作团体存在利益冲突。建议采取的举措包括以下几点:(1)将患者护理质量作为首要原则;(2)设计能够推动患者治疗效果进步的临床试验;(3)强调公众教育(直接面向消费者的信息)以及专业教育;(4)与地方、州和国家的患者权益倡导团体合作,以确保妇科癌症得到最佳治疗;(5)实施实践指南;(6)制定转诊指南;(7)提高学术医生与转诊医生沟通的技能;(8)继续开展并发表疗效研究;(9)建立卓越中心。现在是时候致力于大幅改善美国女性的妇科癌症护理了,而且,我相信,所提议的举措将开始实现这一重要目标。