Schwartz R B, Ledrick D J, Lindman A L
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912, USA.
Wilderness Environ Med. 2001 Winter;12(4):236-8. doi: 10.1580/1080-6032(2001)012[0236:acocml]2.0.co;2.
The use of camp stoves in an enclosed or poorly ventilated space is clearly not recommended due to the risk of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. Instances may arise, however, when use for a limited time is necessary. We sought to find differences in CO levels between various fuels used to power a commercially available camp stove.
A comparison was made between unleaded gasoline, kerosene, and white gas (Coleman fuel). The stove, fuels, and CO detector were all purchased from local retailers. A 0.4-m3 space was constructed with a cardboard box. Three trials were performed using each fuel in which water was heated over the stove for 5 minutes. Measurement of the CO level within the box was taken every 30 seconds.
Kerosene created CO levels of 714 (SD = 113.5) parts per million (ppm) at 2 1/2 minutes but was out of the measurable range of >999 ppm within 4 minutes on each of its trials. White gas burned the cleanest, with an average of 212 ppm (SD = 27.8) at 2 1/2 minutes and 348 ppm (SD = 76.0) at 5 minutes. Unleaded gasoline created 305 ppm (SD = 27.1) at 2 1/2 minutes and 464 ppm (SD = 31.6) at 5 minutes.
All of the fuels created a high level of CO in a short period of time. White gas burned the cleanest and would be preferred to unleaded gasoline or kerosene in the event that the unvented use of a camp stove was necessary.
由于存在一氧化碳(CO)中毒风险,明确不建议在封闭或通风不良的空间使用野营炉具。然而,在某些情况下可能需要进行有限时间的使用。我们试图找出用于一款市售野营炉具的各种燃料之间一氧化碳水平的差异。
对无铅汽油、煤油和白色气体(科尔曼燃料)进行了比较。炉具、燃料和一氧化碳探测器均从当地零售商处购买。用一个纸板箱搭建了一个0.4立方米的空间。每种燃料进行三次试验,在炉具上烧水5分钟。每隔30秒测量箱内的一氧化碳水平。
煤油在2分半钟时产生的一氧化碳水平为百万分之714(标准差 = 113.5),但在每次试验中,4分钟内就超出了可测量范围>百万分之999。白色气体燃烧最清洁,在2分半钟时平均为百万分之212(标准差 = 27.8),5分钟时为百万分之348(标准差 = 76.0)。无铅汽油在2分半钟时产生百万分之305(标准差 = 27.1),5分钟时产生百万分之464(标准差 = 31.6)。
所有燃料在短时间内都产生了高浓度的一氧化碳。白色气体燃烧最清洁,如果必须在无通风条件下使用野营炉具,白色气体比无铅汽油或煤油更可取。