Say C, Lee Y T, Hori J, Spratt J S
J Surg Oncol. 1975;7(4):255-67. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930070402.
The clinical records and treatment results of 163 patients with Hodgkin's disease, who were seen at Ellis Fischel State Cancer Hospital (EFSCH) between 1940 and 1971, were reviewed and analyzed. More than 200 clinical and histological variables were recorded for each case of Hodgkin's disease, including details of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Statistical studies were carried out in order to evaluate the independent prognosis significance of each of these factors. All of the lesions were reclassified according to the Lukes proposal which was modified and recommended at the 1965 Rye classification (except for hepatomegaly which was included in Stage IV). This is a retrospective study, and the modern techniques of staging were rarely used in pretreatment studies (since 1965, only ten patients have had an abdominal exploration). The basic work-up consisted of a complete blood count, urinalysis, blood type, chest X ray, and EKG. Lymphangiogram and radioisotope liver scans were used on less than 10% of the patients. About 30% of the patients had gastrointestinal X rays and 70% had IVP. Bone marrow biopsies -- the majority of which were done by needle aspiration -- were obtained for approximatley 50% of the patients. Clinical stage, histological type, and presence of absence of systemic symptoms appeared to be themost significant prognostic factors. The classification of systemic symptoms according to the criteria of either the Rye or Ann Arbor conferences showed no particular difference in determining the survival rate. Among the systemic symptoms, fever appeared to be the most important for survival rate. Survival rates were higher in nonanemic and nonlymphocytopenic patients. Eosinophilia, blood group, and Rh factor had no prognostic significance. The relapse-free interval was an important indicator of long-term prognosis. The unfavorable influence of relapse in ultimate prognosis was clearly seen; however, the extent of the relapse site was shown to have no significant influence on survival.
对1940年至1971年间在埃利斯·菲舍尔州立癌症医院(EFSCH)就诊的163例霍奇金病患者的临床记录和治疗结果进行了回顾和分析。每例霍奇金病患者记录了200多个临床和组织学变量,包括放疗和化疗的详细情况。进行了统计研究,以评估这些因素中每一个因素的独立预后意义。所有病变均根据卢克斯的提议重新分类,该提议在1965年的赖伊分类中得到修改和推荐(肝肿大除外,肝肿大归入IV期)。这是一项回顾性研究,现代分期技术在治疗前研究中很少使用(自1965年以来,只有10例患者进行了腹部探查)。基本检查包括全血细胞计数、尿液分析、血型、胸部X光和心电图。不到10%的患者使用了淋巴管造影和放射性核素肝脏扫描。约30%的患者进行了胃肠道X光检查,70%的患者进行了静脉肾盂造影。大约50%的患者进行了骨髓活检——其中大多数是通过针吸活检进行的。临床分期、组织学类型和全身症状的有无似乎是最重要的预后因素。根据赖伊或安阿伯会议的标准对全身症状进行分类,在确定生存率方面没有特别差异。在全身症状中,发热似乎对生存率最为重要。非贫血和非淋巴细胞减少的患者生存率较高。嗜酸性粒细胞增多、血型和Rh因子没有预后意义。无复发生存期是长期预后的重要指标。复发对最终预后的不利影响显而易见;然而,复发部位的范围对生存率没有显著影响。