Suppr超能文献

经验支持疗法的现状:对韦斯顿和莫里森(2001年)多维荟萃分析的评论。

The status of empirically supported therapies: comment on Westen and Morrison's (2001) multidimensional meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lambert M J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Dec;69(6):910-3.

Abstract

In this commentary, a meta-analytic review by D. Westen and K. Morrison (2001) is put in a historical context of the controversies over the effects of psychotherapy. It is suggested that recalculations of the effects of psychotherapy have been common in past debates and that Westen and Morrison's estimates understate the effects of therapy. Data are summarized that suggest that outcomes in clinical practice are equivalent to clinical trials research, but only when patients receive similar levels of treatment and regardless of whether empirically supported therapies are offered. Treatment gains are generally maintained. It is suggested that outcomes management strategies would be far more efficient than efficacy and effectiveness research in maximizing patient outcomes.

摘要

在这篇评论中,D. 韦斯顿和K. 莫里森(2001年)的一项荟萃分析评论被置于心理治疗效果争议的历史背景下。文章指出,在过去的辩论中,重新计算心理治疗效果是很常见的,而且韦斯顿和莫里森的估计低估了治疗效果。总结的数据表明,临床实践中的结果与临床试验研究相当,但前提是患者接受相似水平的治疗,且无论是否提供了经实证支持的疗法。治疗效果通常能够维持。文章认为,在最大化患者治疗效果方面,结果管理策略比疗效和有效性研究要高效得多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验