Lambert M J
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Dec;69(6):910-3.
In this commentary, a meta-analytic review by D. Westen and K. Morrison (2001) is put in a historical context of the controversies over the effects of psychotherapy. It is suggested that recalculations of the effects of psychotherapy have been common in past debates and that Westen and Morrison's estimates understate the effects of therapy. Data are summarized that suggest that outcomes in clinical practice are equivalent to clinical trials research, but only when patients receive similar levels of treatment and regardless of whether empirically supported therapies are offered. Treatment gains are generally maintained. It is suggested that outcomes management strategies would be far more efficient than efficacy and effectiveness research in maximizing patient outcomes.
在这篇评论中,D. 韦斯顿和K. 莫里森(2001年)的一项荟萃分析评论被置于心理治疗效果争议的历史背景下。文章指出,在过去的辩论中,重新计算心理治疗效果是很常见的,而且韦斯顿和莫里森的估计低估了治疗效果。总结的数据表明,临床实践中的结果与临床试验研究相当,但前提是患者接受相似水平的治疗,且无论是否提供了经实证支持的疗法。治疗效果通常能够维持。文章认为,在最大化患者治疗效果方面,结果管理策略比疗效和有效性研究要高效得多。