Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney D R, Gokaslan Z L, Shi W, DeMonte F, Lang F F, McCutcheon I E, Hassenbusch S J, Holland E, Hess K, Michael C, Miller D, Sawaya R
Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2001 Aug;95(2):190-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190.
The extent of tumor resection that should be undertaken in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify significant independent predictors of survival in these patients and to determine whether the extent of resection was associated with increased survival time.
The authors retrospectively analyzed 416 consecutive patients with histologically proven GBM who underwent tumor resection at the authors' institution between June 1993 and June 1999. Volumetric data and other tumor characteristics identified on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were collected prospectively.
Five independent predictors of survival were identified: age, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score, extent of resection, and the degree of necrosis and enhancement on preoperative MR imaging studies. A significant survival advantage was associated with resection of 98% or more of the tumor volume (median survival 13 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.4-14.6 months), compared with 8.8 months (95% CI 7.4-10.2 months; p < 0.0001) for resections of less than 98%. Using an outcome scale ranging from 0 to 5 based on age, KPS score, and tumor necrosis on MR imaging, we observed significantly longer survival in patients with lower scores (1-3) who underwent aggressive resections, and a trend toward slightly longer survival was found in patients with higher scores (4-5). Gross-total tumor resection is associated with longer survival in patients with GBM, especially when other predictive variables are favorable.
多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者应进行的肿瘤切除范围仍存在争议。本研究的目的是确定这些患者生存的重要独立预测因素,并确定切除范围是否与生存时间延长相关。
作者回顾性分析了1993年6月至1999年6月期间在作者所在机构接受肿瘤切除的416例经组织学证实为GBM的连续患者。前瞻性收集磁共振(MR)成像确定的体积数据和其他肿瘤特征。
确定了五个生存的独立预测因素:年龄、卡氏功能状态评分(KPS)、切除范围以及术前MR成像研究中的坏死程度和强化程度。与切除肿瘤体积小于98%的患者相比,切除肿瘤体积98%或更多的患者具有显著的生存优势(中位生存期13个月,95%置信区间[CI]11.4 - 14.6个月),切除肿瘤体积小于98%的患者中位生存期为8.8个月(95%CI 7.4 - 10.2个月;p < 0.0001)。使用基于年龄、KPS评分和MR成像上肿瘤坏死情况的0至5分结果量表,我们观察到接受积极切除的低评分(1 - 3分)患者生存期明显更长,高评分(4 - 5分)患者存在生存期略长的趋势。GBM患者的全肿瘤切除与更长的生存期相关,尤其是当其他预测变量有利时。