Suppr超能文献

糖化血红蛋白阈值可改善伴有典型糖尿病肾小球病变的2型糖尿病患者肾功能进程的证据。

Evidence of a threshold value of glycated hemoglobin to improve the course of renal function in type 2 diabetes with typical diabetic glomerulopathy.

作者信息

Brocco E, Velussi M, Cernigoi A M, Abaterusso C, Bruseghin M, Carraro A, Sambataro M, Piarulli F, Sfriso A, Nosadini R

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Center for the Study of Ageing of the National Research Council, University of Padua, Italy.

出版信息

J Nephrol. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(6):461-71.

Abstract

We recently observed that the course of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) rapidly declines in a subgroup of Type 2 diabetic patients (D) with abnormalities of albumin excretion rate (AER) and typical diabetic nephropathy, despite tight blood pressure control. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether amelioration of blood glucose control, using insulin, improves the course of GFR. GFR decay was measured by spline modeling analysis of the plasma clearance rate of 51CR-EDTA, assessed every 6 months. We identified two groups of D using morphometric analysis of renal biopsy, who had values of glomerular basement membrane (GBM) and fractional mesangial volume (Vv mes/glom) respectively below (Group A: 38) or above (Group B: 50) the mean+2SD of values found in 27 kidney donors (GBM: 389 nm; Vv mes/glom: 0.25), as previously described in detail. Median AER was similar at base line in the 2 groups (109 microg/min, 29-1950, in Group A, 113 microg/min, 37-1845, in Group B; n.s.). Conventional metabolic therapy (sulphonylureas and/or biguanides) was used both in Group A and B during a 3 year follow-up period (Period 1). Group B was further divided in two subgroups with body mass index below (Group B, a) and above (Group B, b) the value of 30 kg/m2. Mean +/- SD HbA1c was 8.2 +/- 1.6% in Group A, 8.3 +/- 1.7% in Group B (a) (n.s.) and 9.1 +/- 1.7% in Group B (b) (n.s.). Tight blood pressure control was achieved and maintained using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and/or beta blockers and/or calcium antagonists and/or thiazides. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was 92 +/- 3 mmHg in Group A and 91 +/- 4 mmHg in Group B (n.s.). GFR decay was significantly greater in Group B than in Group A (Group A vs B: +1.21 +/- 0.71 vs -5.86 +/- 1.61 ml/min/1.73 m2/year). Median AER significantly rose in Group B (177 microg/min, p<0.05 vs base line) but not in Group A (134 microg/min, n.s.) during the third year of follow-up. Groups A and B were then followed over 4.1 years (range 3.1-4.4) (Period 2) maintaining the above described antihypertensive regimen, resulting in MAP values similar to those described during Period 1. Group A patients were treated with the same conventional glycemic control during Period 2. Group B (a) was conversely treated with intensive insulin therapy to achieve a HbA1c value below 7.5% (3 daily injections of regular and 1 or 2 daily injections of intermediate acting insulin associated with metformin 500 mg twice daily in 64% of the patients). Group B (b) patients were only treated by metformin (850 mg thrice daily) to achieve a HbA1c value below 7.5%. HbA1c decreased below the 7.5% target value in Group B (a) (7.0 +/- 1.6%, p<0.01 vs Period 1), but not in Group B (b) (8.0 +/- 1.6%, p<0.05 vs Period 1) and in Group A (8.3 +/- 1.7%, n.s. vs Period 1). The GFR decay of Group B, a during Period 2 was lower than that during Period 1 (Period 1 vs Period 2: -5.9 +/- 1.8 vs -1.8 +/- 0.7 ml/min/1.73 m2/year, p<0.01). GFR decay during Period 2 was similar to that observed during Period 1 in Group A (Period 1 vs Period 2: +1.21 +/- 0.71 vs +0.7 +/- 0.6 ml/min/1.73 ml/year, n.s.) and in Group B (b) (Period 1 vs Period 2: -4.4 +/- 0.71 vs -4.2 +/- 0.6 ml/min/1.73 m2/year, n.s.). Median AER did not significantly change in the fourth year of Period 2 , either in Group A or B (Group A vs B: 141 vs 152 microg/min, n.s.). In conclusion, our findings seem to suggest that amelioration of blood glucose control is attained both by insulin and metformin intensive treatment, but only insulin decreases and maintains HbA1c levels below 7.5%. These pattens of HbA1c appear to be a threshold value in order to significantly blunt GFR decay in a subgroup of Type 2 diabetic patients with typical diabetic glomerular lesions, who are less responsive to tight blood pressure control alone. Conversely, the cohort of patients with less severe diabetic glomerulopathy steadily show constant GFR patterns, despite similar abnormalities of albumin excretion rate, and HbA1c average values above 7.5%.

摘要

我们最近观察到,在2型糖尿病患者(D组)的一个亚组中,尽管血压得到严格控制,但白蛋白排泄率(AER)异常且患有典型糖尿病肾病的患者,其肾小球滤过率(GFR)仍迅速下降。本研究的目的是评估使用胰岛素改善血糖控制是否能改善GFR的病程。通过对51Cr-EDTA血浆清除率进行样条建模分析来测量GFR衰减,每6个月评估一次。我们通过肾活检的形态计量分析确定了两组D组患者,他们的肾小球基底膜(GBM)和系膜分数体积(Vv mes/glom)值分别低于(A组:38例)或高于(B组:50例)27名肾脏供体中发现的值的平均值+2SD(GBM:389nm;Vv mes/glom:0.25),如先前详细描述的那样。两组基线时的AER中位数相似(A组为109μg/min,范围29 - 1950;B组为113μg/min,范围37 - 1845;无统计学差异)。在3年的随访期(第1阶段)中,A组和B组均采用传统代谢疗法(磺脲类和/或双胍类)。B组进一步分为两个亚组,体重指数低于(B,a组)和高于(B,b组)30kg/m2的值。A组的平均±标准差HbA1c为8.2±1.6%,B(a)组为8.3±1.7%(无统计学差异),B(b)组为9.1±1.7%(无统计学差异)。使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和/或β受体阻滞剂和/或钙拮抗剂和/或噻嗪类药物实现并维持严格的血压控制。A组的平均动脉血压(MAP)为92±3mmHg,B组为91±4mmHg(无统计学差异)。B组的GFR衰减明显大于A组(A组与B组:+1.21±0.71 vs -5.86±1.61ml/min/1.73m2/年)。在随访的第三年,B组的AER中位数显著升高(177μg/min,与基线相比p<0.05),而A组未升高(134μg/min,无统计学差异)。然后,A组和B组在4.1年(范围3.1 - 4.4)(第2阶段)内继续随访,维持上述降压方案,MAP值与第1阶段相似。第2阶段A组患者采用相同的传统血糖控制方法。相反,B(a)组采用强化胰岛素治疗以使HbA1c值低于7.5%(64%的患者每日3次注射短效胰岛素和每日1或2次注射中效胰岛素,联合每日2次服用500mg二甲双胍)。B(b)组患者仅接受二甲双胍治疗(每日3次,每次850mg)以使HbA1c值低于7.5%。B(a)组的HbA1c降至7.5%的目标值以下(7.0±1.6%,与第1阶段相比p<0.01),但B(b)组未降至该值以下(8.0±1.6%,与第1阶段相比p<0.05),A组也未降至该值以下(8.3±1.7%,与第1阶段相比无统计学差异)。第2阶段B(a)组的GFR衰减低于第1阶段(第1阶段与第2阶段:-5.9±1.8 vs -1.8±0.7ml/min/1.73m2/年,p<0.01)。第2阶段A组的GFR衰减与第1阶段相似(第1阶段与第2阶段:+1.21±0.71 vs +0.7±0.6ml/min/1.73ml/年,无统计学差异),B(b)组也相似(第1阶段与第2阶段:-4.4±0.71 vs -4.2±0.6ml/min/1.73m2/年,无统计学差异)。在第2阶段的第四年,A组或B组的AER中位数均无显著变化(A组与B组:141 vs 152μg/min,无统计学差异)。总之,我们的研究结果似乎表明,胰岛素和二甲双胍强化治疗均可改善血糖控制,但只有胰岛素能将HbA1c水平降低并维持在7.5%以下。这些HbA1c模式似乎是一个阈值,以便在对单纯严格血压控制反应较差的2型糖尿病典型肾小球病变亚组患者中显著抑制GFR衰减。相反,患有较轻糖尿病肾小球病的患者队列,尽管白蛋白排泄率异常相似且HbA1c平均值高于7.5%,但其GFR模式仍稳定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验