Karlberg Mikael, Aw Swee T, Halmagyi G Michael, Black Ross A
Department of Neuro-otolgy, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jan;128(1):21-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.1.21.
Vibration to the head or neck excites vestibular and neck muscle spindle afferents. Can such vibrations improve the sensitivity of the subjective visual horizontal (SVH) test to chronic unilateral deficit of the vestibular system?
Controlled experimental study.
Tertiary referral center.
Thirteen healthy subjects and 23 patients with chronic unilateral vestibular deficits after vestibular neurectomy or neurolabyrinthitis. Results of head-impulse test showed unilateral loss of function of all 3 semicircular canals in 14 patients and loss of anterior and lateral semicircular canals in 9 patients.
Unilateral vibration (92 Hz; 0.6-mm amplitude) applied to sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) or mastoid bone.
Results of SVH test (in degrees).
Without vibration, 13 of 23 patients and all healthy subjects had SVH of less than 3 degrees (sensitivity, 43%; specificity, 100%). During vibration to the ipsilesional SCM, SVH increased to greater than 3 degrees in 21 of 23 patients but in only 1 of 13 healthy subjects (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 92%). The patient group had significantly greater SVH shifts to the ipsilesional side than did healthy subjects in response to SCM and mastoid bone vibration on either side. The SVH shift during vibration to the ipsilesional SCM was significantly greater than that during vibration to the contralesional muscle (P<.001) or to the mastoid bone on either side (P<.05). The vibration-induced SVH shift was significantly greater in those patients with loss of 3 semicircular canals than in those with loss of 2 (P<.01).
The sensitivity of the SVH test to chronic unilateral vestibular deficits can be improved by applying vibration to the SCM. The magnitude of vibratory SVH shift is related to the extent of unilateral deficit of the otolithic organs, vertical canals, or both.
头部或颈部的振动会刺激前庭和颈部肌肉梭传入神经。这种振动能否提高主观视觉水平(SVH)测试对前庭系统慢性单侧缺陷的敏感性?
对照实验研究。
三级转诊中心。
13名健康受试者和23名在前庭神经切除术或神经迷路炎后患有慢性单侧前庭缺陷的患者。头部脉冲测试结果显示,14名患者的所有3个半规管单侧功能丧失,9名患者的前半规管和外侧半规管功能丧失。
对胸锁乳突肌(SCM)或乳突骨进行单侧振动(92Hz;0.6mm振幅)。
SVH测试结果(以度为单位)。
在无振动情况下,23名患者中的13名以及所有健康受试者的SVH小于3度(敏感性为43%;特异性为100%)。在向患侧SCM振动期间,23名患者中的21名SVH增加到大于3度,但13名健康受试者中只有1名如此(敏感性为91%;特异性为92%)。与健康受试者相比,患者组在两侧SCM和乳突骨振动时向患侧的SVH偏移明显更大。向患侧SCM振动期间的SVH偏移明显大于向对侧肌肉振动期间(P<0.001)或向两侧乳突骨振动期间(P<0.05)。与丧失2个半规管的患者相比,丧失3个半规管的患者振动诱导的SVH偏移明显更大(P<0.01)。
通过对SCM施加振动可提高SVH测试对慢性单侧前庭缺陷的敏感性。振动性SVH偏移的幅度与耳石器官、垂直半规管或两者单侧缺陷的程度有关。