Serradimigni A, Bory M, Djiane P, Sacerdote P, Mathieu P, Léonetti J, Egre A
Nouv Presse Med. 1975 Sep 27;4(31):2253-6.
The authors have studied in 212 patients the diagnostic value of radio-active fibrinogen and rheography in deep venous thrombosis of the leg by comparing the results from these two methods with phlebography. Radio-active fibrinogen seems the better means of diagnosis in early distal phlebitis. However, the method is expansive, the radio-active substance can only be manipulated in certain specialized centers, and is useless in the presence of hematoma. Rheography is less expansive, more easily manipulated, yet less sensitive as only proximal phlebitis can be detected-especially when completely occlusive. In addition, active patient cooperation is necessary. The time needed to realize the two methods is a major obstacle; however, they can be fruitful if integrated into a specialized department for the diagnosis and treatment of thrombo embolic disease.
作者通过将放射性纤维蛋白原和血流描记术这两种方法的结果与静脉造影术进行比较,研究了其在212例患者下肢深静脉血栓形成中的诊断价值。放射性纤维蛋白原似乎是早期远端静脉炎更好的诊断方法。然而,该方法费用高昂,放射性物质只能在某些专业中心进行操作,并且在存在血肿的情况下无用。血流描记术费用较低,操作更容易,但敏感性较低,因为只能检测到近端静脉炎——尤其是在完全闭塞时。此外,患者需要积极配合。实施这两种方法所需的时间是一个主要障碍;然而,如果将它们整合到一个血栓栓塞性疾病诊断和治疗的专业科室中,可能会取得成效。