Sabar R, Kaye A D, Frost E A
Department of Anesthesiology, Texas Tech University School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2001 Oct;16(3):287-314.
Herbal medicines have enormous presence in the United States health care system. There is an increasing trend towards reimbursement of herbal medicines by insurance companies, which further encourage their utilization. Herbs are listed under the "supplement" category by the Food and Drug Administration. The Dietary Supplement and Health Education Act signed into law in October 1994, requires no proof of efficacy, no demonstration of safety, and sets no standards for quality control for the products labeled as "supplements" thereby increasing the risk of adverse effects of these herbs. The United States has experienced an epidemic of over-the-counter "natural" products over the last two decades; but there is little motivation for the manufactures to conduct randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trials to unequivocally prove the safety and efficacy of these drugs. Physicians, irrespective of their specialty, should not underestimate the potential risks associated with the use of herbs as reports indicate that within the last two decades, more than 100 herbogenic deaths have occurred, many serious complications have been reported, patients have required renal dialysis, renal transplantation and hepatic transplantation after taking botanicals. Internists must inquire about the patient's use of herbal products. In addition, the education of each patient regarding the serious, potential drug-herb interactions should be a routine component of preoperative assessment. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) recommends that all herbal medications should be discontinued 2-3 weeks prior to an elective surgical procedure. If the patient is not sure of the content of the herbal medicine, he/she should be urged to bring the container so that an attempt can be made to review the contents of the preparation. While such an action holds some promise in the elective setting, emergency care should be based on a thorough drug-intake history from the patient or a relative, if possible. Medical research and medical literature in general has not addressed this new group of health supplements, despite the fact that many of these herbs have the potential to cause serious health problems and drug interations. There is a need to conduct scientific clinical trials to study the anesthetic drug responses to commonly used neutraceutical agents.
草药在美国医疗保健系统中占据着重要地位。保险公司对草药报销的趋势日益增加,这进一步促进了草药的使用。草药被美国食品药品监督管理局列为“补充剂”类别。1994年10月签署成为法律的《膳食补充剂健康教育法》,不要求证明疗效,不要求证明安全性,也不为标注为“补充剂”的产品设定质量控制标准,从而增加了这些草药产生不良反应的风险。在过去二十年里,美国非处方“天然”产品盛行;但制造商几乎没有动力进行随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验来明确证明这些药物的安全性和有效性。无论专科如何,医生都不应低估使用草药相关的潜在风险,因为有报告表明,在过去二十年里,已发生100多起因草药导致的死亡,还报告了许多严重并发症,患者在服用植物药后需要进行肾透析、肾移植和肝移植。内科医生必须询问患者使用草药产品的情况。此外,对每位患者进行关于严重潜在药物 - 草药相互作用的教育应成为术前评估的常规内容。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)建议,在择期手术前2 - 3周应停用所有草药药物。如果患者不确定草药的成分,应敦促其带上容器,以便尝试查看制剂的成分。虽然这种做法在择期情况下有一定作用,但在紧急护理中,如果可能的话,应基于患者或亲属提供的详尽用药史。尽管许多此类草药有可能导致严重健康问题和药物相互作用,但总体而言,医学研究和医学文献尚未涉及这一新的健康补充剂群体。有必要进行科学临床试验,以研究常用营养保健品对麻醉药物反应的影响。