Suppr超能文献

评估农业流域中磷流失的场地脆弱性。

Assessing site vulnerability to phosphorus loss in an agricultural watershed.

作者信息

Sharpley A N, McDowell R W, Weld J L, Kleinman P J

机构信息

USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802-3702, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2001 Nov-Dec;30(6):2026-36. doi: 10.2134/jeq2001.2026.

Abstract

A P index was developed as a tool to rank agricultural fields on the basis of P loss vulnerability, helping to target remedial P management options within watersheds. We evaluated two approaches, a soil P threshold and components of a P index, by comparing site vulnerability estimates derived from these two approaches with measured runoff P losses in an agricultural watershed in Pennsylvania. Rainfall-surface runoff simulations (70 mm h(-1) for 30 min) were conducted on 57 sites representing the full range of soil P concentrations and management conditions found in the watershed. Each site was comprised of two, abutting 2-m2 runoff plots, serving as duplicate observations. For sites that had not received P additions for at least six months prior to the study, Mehlich-3 P concentration was strongly associated with dissolved P concentrations (r2 = 0.86) and losses (r2 = 0.83) in surface runoff, as well as with total P concentration (r2 = 0.80) and loss (r2 = 0.74). However, Mehlich-3 P alone was poorly correlated with runoff P from sites receiving manure within three weeks prior to rainfall. The P index effectively described 88 and 83% of the variability in dissolved P concentrations and losses from all sites in the watershed, and P index ratings exhibited strong associations with total P concentrations (r2 = 0.81) and losses (r2 = 0.79). When site-specific observations were extrapolated to all fields in the watershed, management recommendations derived from a P index approach were less restrictive than those derived from the soil P threshold approach, better reflecting the low P loads exported from the watershed.

摘要

磷指数(P index)是一种根据磷流失脆弱性对农田进行排名的工具,有助于在流域内确定补救性磷管理方案。我们通过比较这两种方法得出的场地脆弱性估计值与宾夕法尼亚州一个农业流域实测径流磷流失量,评估了两种方法,即土壤磷阈值法和磷指数法的组成部分。对代表该流域土壤磷浓度和管理条件全范围的57个场地进行了降雨 - 地表径流模拟(70毫米/小时,持续30分钟)。每个场地由两个相邻的2平方米径流小区组成,作为重复观测。对于在研究前至少六个月未施磷的场地,Mehlich - 3磷浓度与地表径流中溶解磷浓度(r2 = 0.86)和流失量(r2 = 0.83)以及总磷浓度(r2 = 0.80)和流失量(r2 = 0.74)密切相关。然而,仅Mehlich - 3磷与降雨前三周内施用过粪肥的场地的径流磷相关性较差。磷指数有效地描述了流域内所有场地溶解磷浓度和流失量变化的88%和83%,并且磷指数评级与总磷浓度(r2 = 0.81)和流失量(r2 = 0.79)表现出很强的相关性。当将特定场地的观测结果外推到流域内所有田地时,基于磷指数法得出的管理建议比基于土壤磷阈值法得出的建议限制更少,能更好地反映该流域输出的低磷负荷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验