Schillevoort I, de Boer A, Herings R M, Roos R A, Jansen P A, Leufkens H G
Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ann Pharmacother. 2001 Dec;35(12):1517-22. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A068.
To compare the risk of extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) between risperidone, olanzapine, and haloperidol, taking into account patients' past antipsychotic drug use and past EPS.
Data were obtained from the PHARMO-database, containing filled prescriptions of 450,000 community-dwelling people in the Netherlands from 1986 through 1999. We defined cohorts of first-time users of haloperidol, risperidone, or olanzapine aged 15 to 54 years. In the first 90 days of treatment, we assessed the occurrence of EPS, defined as first use of any antiparkinsonian agent. We estimated relative risks of EPS for risperidone and olanzapine versus haloperidol using a Cox proportional hazards model. Patients were subdivided according to prior use of antipsychotic and antiparkinsonian drugs.
We identified 424 patients starting treatment with haloperidol, 243 with risperidone, and 181 with olanzapine. Prior use of antipsychotic plus antiparkinsonian medication was significantly more frequent among users of risperidone and olanzapine than in those using haloperidol (36.2%, 40.3%, and 4.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Within most subgroups of comparable treatment history, patients using risperidone and olanzapine showed reduced risks of EPS compared with haloperidol, although some of these findings did not reach statistical significance (RR 0.03-0.22). However, this was not observed for patients using risperidone who had experienced EPS in the past (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.24 to 7.18).
In general, we observed reduced risks of EPS for risperidone and olanzapine compared with haloperidol within subgroups of patients with a similar treatment history. However, the added value of risperidone in patients who have experienced EPS in the past needs further study.
比较利培酮、奥氮平和氟哌啶醇引起锥体外系综合征(EPS)的风险,同时考虑患者既往使用抗精神病药物的情况及既往EPS史。
数据来自PHARMO数据库,该数据库包含1986年至1999年荷兰45万社区居民的处方信息。我们定义了年龄在15至54岁之间首次使用氟哌啶醇、利培酮或奥氮平的队列。在治疗的前90天内,我们评估EPS的发生情况,定义为首次使用任何抗帕金森药物。我们使用Cox比例风险模型估计利培酮和奥氮平相对于氟哌啶醇发生EPS的相对风险。患者根据既往使用抗精神病药物和抗帕金森药物的情况进行细分。
我们确定了424例开始使用氟哌啶醇治疗的患者、243例使用利培酮的患者和181例使用奥氮平的患者。既往使用抗精神病药物加抗帕金森药物的情况在使用利培酮和奥氮平的患者中比使用氟哌啶醇的患者更为频繁(分别为36.2%、40.3%和4.5%;p<0.001)。在大多数具有可比治疗史的亚组中,与氟哌啶醇相比,使用利培酮和奥氮平的患者发生EPS的风险降低,尽管其中一些结果未达到统计学显著性(RR 0.03 - 0.22)。然而,对于既往有EPS史的使用利培酮的患者未观察到这种情况(RR 1.30;95% CI 0.24至7.18)。
总体而言,在具有相似治疗史的患者亚组中,我们观察到与氟哌啶醇相比,利培酮和奥氮平引起EPS的风险降低。然而,利培酮在既往有EPS史的患者中的附加价值需要进一步研究。