Huang Q, Morrison A C, Boerwinkle E
Human Genetics Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6901 Bertner, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 2001;21 Suppl 1:S620-5. doi: 10.1002/gepi.2001.21.s1.s620.
We have used the unblinded MG1/Q1 Genetic Analysis Workshop 12 simulated data as a model system for investigating the use of linkage disequilibrium structure and simple genotype-phenotype associations to identify candidate functional mutations within a gene of interest. Analysis of the pattern of pairwise linkage disequilibrium indicated three groups of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for which the linkage disequilibrium was high between sites within a group, but lower between sites of different groups. Using linear regression to predict levels of the trait Q1 showed that the known functional site, 5782, was usually not the best genetic predictor of Q1, but sites belonging to the same group as 5782 (i.e., group 2) were always included in the prediction model. In 49 out of the 50 replicates, the functional site was not the best predictor of the trait. Finally, more detailed analyses demonstrate that the relationship between the adjusted R2 for the marker in the prediction model and its disequilibrium with 5782 was linear with the intercept at the origin and terminating at the R2 value for the known functional mutation when the disequilibrium is maximal. These data indicate that simple association studies will not identify the functional mutation, but rather will identify candidate functional mutations that are in very tight linkage disequilibrium with the functional mutation.
我们使用了非盲法的MG1/Q1遗传分析研讨会12模拟数据作为模型系统,以研究如何利用连锁不平衡结构和简单的基因型-表型关联来识别感兴趣基因内的候选功能突变。对成对连锁不平衡模式的分析表明,存在三组单核苷酸多态性,同一组内位点之间的连锁不平衡较高,但不同组位点之间的连锁不平衡较低。使用线性回归预测性状Q1的水平表明,已知的功能位点5782通常不是Q1的最佳遗传预测指标,但与5782属于同一组(即第2组)的位点总是包含在预测模型中。在50次重复中的49次中,功能位点不是性状的最佳预测指标。最后,更详细的分析表明,预测模型中标记的调整R2与其与5782的不平衡之间的关系是线性的,在不平衡最大时,截距为零,终止于已知功能突变的R2值。这些数据表明,简单的关联研究无法识别功能突变,而是会识别与功能突变处于非常紧密连锁不平衡状态的候选功能突变。