Moser K L, Jedrey C M, Conti D, Schick J H, Gray-McGuire C, Nath S K, Daley D, Olson J M
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 2001;21 Suppl 1:S726-31. doi: 10.1002/gepi.2001.21.s1.s726.
Three multivariate techniques used to derive principal components (PCs) from family data were compared for their ability to model family data and power to detect linkage. Using the simulated data from Genetic Analysis Workshop 12, the five quantitative traits were first adjusted for age, sex, and environmental factors 1 and 2. Then, standard PCs, PCs obtained from between-family covariance, and PCs obtained from within-family genetic covariance were derived and subjected to multivariate sib pair linkage analysis. The standard PCs obtained from the overall correlation matrix allowed identification of key features of the true genetic model more readily than did the other methods. For detection of linkage, standard PCs and PCs obtained from the between-family genetic covariance performed similarly in terms of both power and type 1 error, and both methods performed better than the PCs obtained from within-family genetic covariance.
比较了三种用于从家系数据中推导主成分(PCs)的多变量技术,以评估它们对家系数据建模的能力和检测连锁的效能。使用遗传分析研讨会12的模拟数据,首先对五个数量性状进行年龄、性别以及环境因素1和2的校正。然后,推导得到标准主成分、从家系间协方差获得的主成分以及从家系内遗传协方差获得的主成分,并对其进行多变量同胞对连锁分析。与其他方法相比,从总体相关矩阵获得的标准主成分能更轻松地识别真实遗传模型的关键特征。对于连锁检测,标准主成分和从家系间遗传协方差获得的主成分在效能和I型错误方面表现相似,且这两种方法都比从家系内遗传协方差获得的主成分表现更好。