Suppr超能文献

优先购买权与医疗设备:对阿德勒和曼的回应

Preemption and medical devices: a response to Adler and Mann.

作者信息

Hermann M, Ritts G J

机构信息

Jones, Day, Revis & Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Food Drug Law J. 1996;51(1):1-19.

Abstract

In a recent article in the Missouri Law Review, Professors Robert Adler and Richard Mann assert that the express preemption provision of the Medical Device Amendments of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act does not preempt common law tort claims. As Adler and Mann concede, theirs is an atypical and minority view. The better view, as addressed in this article, is that the Medical Device Amendments indeed do preempt common law.

摘要

在《密苏里法律评论》最近的一篇文章中,罗伯特·阿德勒教授和理查德·曼教授断言,《联邦食品、药品和化妆品法案》中医疗器械修正案的明确优先适用条款并不优先于普通法侵权索赔。正如阿德勒和曼所承认的,他们的观点是非典型的少数派观点。如本文所述,更好的观点是医疗器械修正案确实优先于普通法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验