Jupp P G
National Institute for Virology and Department of Virology, University of the Witwatersrand, Sandringham, South Africa.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Dec;951:143-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb02692.x.
This paper reviews studies done on West Nile virus (WNV) in South Africa, mainly between 1962 and 1980 on the temperate inland plateau (Highveld and Karoo). The virus is maintained in an enzootic transmission cycle between feral birds and the ornithophilic mosquito Culex univittatus. About 30 avian species have been shown to be involved without mortality. Humans, and other mammals, although they may have antibodies, are considered blind-alleys in the transmission cycle except perhaps some dogs. Cx. univittatus also transfers infection to humans, almost invariably causing only a mild illness. Its usually low anthropophilism may explain why annual human infection on the Highveld is limited to sporadic cases. Besides multiple isolations from field collections of Cx. univittatus, this mosquito is both highly susceptible to the virus and an efficient transmitter. Culex theileri is a minor vector. In the summer of 1974 there was a large epidemic in the dry Karoo after unusual rains: there were many human cases, the infection rate in Cx. univittatus was 39.0/1000, and postepidemic immune rates in humans and birds were high. In 1984 there was an epizootic in Gauteng Province in the Highveld with an infection rate in Cx. univittatus reaching 9.6/1000 and more human infections than usual. The much lower immune rates in the KwaZulu-Natal coastal lowlands than on the plateau and the single isolation from Cx. neavei, which replaces Cx. univittatus in the lowlands, are explained by the low susceptibility of Cx. neavei to the virus. Genetic relatedness of isolates from different countries showed two lineages, with one lineage comprising only African isolates, including 25 South African strains, which had a sequence homology of 86.3-100%. This suggests that the viral enzooticity does not depend on annual importation of virus in migrant birds.
本文回顾了在南非开展的关于西尼罗河病毒(WNV)的研究,主要是1962年至1980年期间在温带内陆高原(高草原和卡鲁地区)进行的研究。该病毒在野生鸟类和嗜鸟库蚊之间维持着一种地方性传播循环。已证明约30种鸟类参与其中但无死亡情况。人类和其他哺乳动物,尽管可能有抗体,但在传播循环中被视为死胡同,或许某些狗除外。单带库蚊也会将感染传播给人类,几乎总是仅引发轻微疾病。其通常较低的嗜人性或许可以解释为何高草原地区每年的人类感染仅限于散发病例。除了从野外采集的单带库蚊中多次分离出病毒外,这种蚊子对该病毒高度易感且是高效传播者。泰勒库蚊是次要传播媒介。1974年夏季,异常降雨后干旱的卡鲁地区发生了大规模疫情:出现了许多人类病例,单带库蚊的感染率为39.0/1000,疫情后人类和鸟类的免疫率很高。1984年,高草原地区的豪登省发生了一次动物疫情,单带库蚊的感染率达到9.6/1000,且人类感染病例比往常更多。夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔沿海低地的免疫率远低于高原地区,以及在低地取代单带库蚊的尼氏库蚊仅分离出一例病毒,原因是尼氏库蚊对该病毒的易感性较低。来自不同国家的病毒分离株的遗传相关性显示出两个谱系,其中一个谱系仅包括非洲分离株,包括25株南非菌株,其序列同源性为86.3 - 100%。这表明病毒的地方性不依赖于候鸟每年带入病毒。