Pepper C B, Davidson N C, Ross D L
Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Wentworthville, Sydney, Australia.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Dec;12(12):1335-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.01335.x.
Catheterization of the coronary sinus (CS) from the femoral vein can be challenging. We tested whether use of a long preshaped sheath facilitates CS cannulation.
One hundred four patients were randomized into two phases. In phase 1, consecutive patients were allocated to CS catheterization using the long sheath (n = 26) or standard 7-French 15-cm sheath (n = 25). If unsuccessful within 10 minutes, the alternative technique was used. Phase 2 assessed the utility of the long sheath in difficult cases. All patients initially were approached using the standard sheath. If cannulation failed after 10 minutes, patients were randomly allocated to the standard or long sheath approach. In phase 1, the standard approach failed in 4 (16%) of 25 cases. In each case, a long sheath proved successful (mean 3.2 min). The long sheath approach was successful within 10 minutes in all 26 cases. Catheter deployment was significantly quicker with the long sheath, but this was offset by the time required for sheath insertion. In phase 2, the standard approach was successful in 46 (87%) of 53 cases. Of 7 "failures," 3 were randomized to continue the standard approach, which was successful in 1; 4 were randomized to the long sheath approach, and success was achieved in all (mean 4.4+/-1.5 min). Overall, the CS could not be promptly catheterized in 15% of cases within 10 minutes using the standard sheath, and no failures were seen using the long sheath. No complications arose from the use of either technique.
The long sheath was uniformly successful in permitting catheterization of the CS from the femoral approach in both unselected and difficult cases.
经股静脉进行冠状窦(CS)插管可能具有挑战性。我们测试了使用长预塑形鞘是否有助于CS插管。
104例患者被随机分为两个阶段。在第1阶段,连续的患者被分配使用长鞘(n = 26)或标准的7法国15厘米鞘(n = 25)进行CS插管。如果在10分钟内未成功,则使用替代技术。第2阶段评估长鞘在困难病例中的效用。所有患者最初均采用标准鞘进行操作。如果10分钟后插管失败,患者被随机分配至标准或长鞘方法。在第1阶段,25例中有4例(16%)标准方法失败。在每种情况下,长鞘均成功(平均3.2分钟)。长鞘方法在所有26例中均在10分钟内成功。使用长鞘时导管置入明显更快,但这被鞘插入所需时间所抵消。在第2阶段,标准方法在53例中有46例(87%)成功。在7例“失败”病例中,3例被随机分配继续标准方法,其中1例成功;4例被随机分配至长鞘方法,全部成功(平均4.4±1.5分钟)。总体而言,使用标准鞘时,15%的病例在10分钟内无法迅速完成CS插管,而使用长鞘未见失败病例。两种技术的使用均未出现并发症。
在未选择的病例和困难病例中,长鞘均能成功地经股途径进行CS插管。