Suppr超能文献

视觉检查与激光荧光系统用于咬合面龋病活体诊断的比较。

Comparison between visual examination and a laser fluorescence system for in vivo diagnosis of occlusal caries.

作者信息

Sheehy E C, Brailsford S R, Kidd E A, Beighton D, Zoitopoulos L

机构信息

Dental Caries Research Group, Guy's King's and St. Thomas' Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Caries Res. 2001 Nov-Dec;35(6):421-6. doi: 10.1159/000047485.

Abstract

This study compared a laser fluorescence (LF) system (DIAGNOdent) with a visual caries scoring system for in vivo detection and diagnosis of occlusal caries under the conditions of an epidemiological study, in 132 mandibular and 38 maxillary first permanent molars in 170 children (mean age: 6.85 +/- 0.58 years). The teeth were cleaned and occlusal caries status in a selected investigation site recorded using both visual and LF systems. The LF readings were interpreted both according to the cut-off points recommended by the manufacturers and those based on laboratory research with histological validation. The percentage agreement of the LF and visual scoring system was better using the cut-off limits recommended by the manufacturer. Histological validation was not possible in this clinical study, but it appeared that either the LF method was overscoring some lesions or the visual method was underscoring them. Since the LF instrument cannot be expected to differentiate caries from hypomineralisation, it should probably be used as an adjunct to a clinical examination.

摘要

本研究在流行病学研究条件下,对170名儿童(平均年龄:6.85±0.58岁)的132颗下颌第一恒磨牙和38颗上颌第一恒磨牙,比较了激光荧光(LF)系统(DIAGNOdent)与视觉龋病评分系统用于咬合面龋病的体内检测和诊断。对牙齿进行清洁,并使用视觉和LF系统记录选定调查部位的咬合面龋病状况。LF读数既根据制造商推荐的临界点进行解读,也根据基于组织学验证的实验室研究结果进行解读。使用制造商推荐的临界值时,LF与视觉评分系统的百分比一致性更好。在这项临床研究中无法进行组织学验证,但似乎要么是LF方法对某些病变的评分过高,要么是视觉方法对病变的评分过低。由于不能期望LF仪器区分龋病和矿化不足,它可能应作为临床检查的辅助手段使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验