• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

High-risk carotid endarterectomy: challenges for carotid stent protocols.

作者信息

Jordan William D, Alcocer Francisco, Wirthlin Douglas J, Fisher Winfield S, Warren Julio A, McDowell Holt A, Whitley W David

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1922 7th Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0016, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2002 Jan;35(1):16-21; discussion 22. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121052.

DOI:10.1067/mva.2002.121052
PMID:11802128
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid angioplasty and stenting is under investigation in clinical trials as an alternative to endarterectomy. Some clinicians have hypothesized that stenting would be applicable for patients at high risk who need carotid revascularization. To further test this hypothesis, we stratified our carotid endarterectomy procedures according to current carotid stent protocols.

METHODS

We reviewed our computerized registry and the clinical charts of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy. Each procedure was categorized as high risk or low risk, according to the following six separate high-risk factors: 1, severe cardiac dysfunction; 2, the requirement for combined coronary and carotid vascularization; 3, severe pulmonary dysfunction; 4, contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion; 5, previous ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy; and 6, anatomically limited access for carotid endarterectomy. Rates of stroke at 30 days, cardiac complications, and death were tabulated.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000, 415 carotid endarterectomies were performed on 389 patients. Ninety-eight procedures (23.6%) were classified as high risk on the basis of the following factors: 1, severe cardiac dysfunction (n = 30); 2, requirement for combined coronary and carotid revascularization (n = 14); 3, severe pulmonary dysfunction (n = 8); 4, contralateral carotid occlusion (n = 31); 5, previous ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy (n = 25); and 6, anatomically limited access (n = 4). Seven patients had ipsilateral postoperative strokes (1.7%), with two additional patients having contralateral hemispheric strokes. One patient died from exacerbation of congestive heart failure 9 days after undergoing a second carotid endarterectomy. The total stroke and death rate was 2.6% for all the patients. Two of the 98 procedures in the high-risk group were complicated with ipsilateral stroke (2.0%) as compared with six of the 317 low-risk procedures (1.9%; P = 1). Six procedures were complicated with cardiac dysfunction after surgery, including myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or the new onset of atrial fibrillation. Three cardiac complications occurred in the low-risk group (1%), and three occurred in the high-risk group (3.1%; P =.15).

CONCLUSION

This series shows that patients at high risk can undergo carotid endarterectomy with stroke rates equivalent to the rates of patients at low risk. The cardiac morbidity rate may be increased in the high-risk group. Carotid stenting is unlikely to offer any improvement in stroke risk as compared with carotid endarterectomy, but stenting may reduce non-stroke morbidity rates associated with some high-risk cases.

摘要

相似文献

1
High-risk carotid endarterectomy: challenges for carotid stent protocols.
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Jan;35(1):16-21; discussion 22. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121052.
2
Is there any benefit from staged carotid and coronary revascularization using carotid stents? A single-center experience highlights the need for a randomized controlled trial.使用颈动脉支架进行分期颈动脉和冠状动脉血运重建有什么益处吗?一项单中心经验凸显了随机对照试验的必要性。
Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):435-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000198876.32450.a7. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
3
Thirty-day morbidity and mortality rates for carotid artery intervention by surgeons who perform both carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement.同时进行颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术的外科医生进行颈动脉介入治疗的30天发病率和死亡率。
J Neurosurg. 2007 Feb;106(2):217-21. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.2.217.
4
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
5
Carotid artery stenting for recurrent carotid artery restenosis after previous ipsilateral carotid artery endarterectomy or stenting: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.颈动脉支架置入术治疗同侧颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术后再发颈动脉狭窄:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.004.
6
Carotid stenting and endarterectomy: a clinical and cost comparison of revascularization strategies.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术:血管重建策略的临床与成本比较
Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1063-70. doi: 10.1161/hs0402.105304.
7
Association between operator specialty and outcomes after carotid artery revascularization.术者专业与颈动脉血运重建术后结局的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):478-489.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.123. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
8
Immediate and remote results of using carotid endarterectomy and stenting of internal carotid arteries.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈内动脉支架置入术的近期和远期效果。
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2013;19(2):102-10, 93-100.
9
"Medical high risk" designation is not associated with survival after carotid artery stenting.“医疗高风险”标识与颈动脉支架置入术后的生存率无关。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.046. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
10
Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for carotid endarterectomy in patients with ipsilateral symptoms.对有同侧症状患者行颈动脉内膜切除术术前危险因素的多中心回顾。
Stroke. 1994 Jun;25(6):1116-21. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.6.1116.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative Coronary Stenosis Is a Determinant of Early Vascular Outcome after Carotid Endarterectomy.术前冠状动脉狭窄是颈动脉内膜剥脱术后早期血管转归的一个决定因素。
J Clin Neurol. 2015 Oct;11(4):364-71. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2015.11.4.364. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
2
Cardiac damage after carotid intervention: a meta-analysis after a decade of randomized trials.颈动脉介入术后的心脏损伤:十年随机试验后的荟萃分析。
J Anesth. 2014 Dec;28(6):866-72. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1843-5. Epub 2014 May 15.
3
Indications and applications for extracranial carotid artery stent placement.
颅外颈动脉支架置入术的适应证及应用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010 Jan;12(1):42-50. doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0072-2.
4
Carotid endarterectomy remains the standard of care, even in high-risk surgical patients.即使对于高风险手术患者,颈动脉内膜切除术仍是治疗的标准方法。
Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):356-63. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000150270.86267.29.
5
Carotid endarterectomy at the millennium: what interventional therapy must match.千禧年的颈动脉内膜切除术:介入治疗必须与之匹配的内容。
Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):535-44; discussion 544-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137142.26925.3c.