• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术后腹膜缝合与不缝合在疼痛方面的随机对照比较。

A randomized comparison of postcesarean pain between closure and nonclosure of peritoneum.

作者信息

Chanrachakul B, Hamontri S, Herabutya Y

机构信息

Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Feb 10;101(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00503-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00503-6
PMID:11803097
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the intensity of postcesarean pain between closure and nonclosure of peritoneum in the women with a midline incision and one previous cesarean section.

STUDY DESIGN

The setting was an obstetrics unit of a university teaching hospital. A double-blind randomized trial was performed on 60 pregnant women with a midline incision and one previous cesarean section who underwent elective repeated cesarean section. Thirty women each were allocated to the "closure" group and the "nonclosure" group. The principal outcome measure was the postcesarean pain assessed by visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

There was no difference in postoperative pain for closure and nonclosure of peritoneum groups in repeated cesarean patients; while resting (P=0.8), while moving in bed (P=0.94), and while walking (P=0.52). The use of opiate (P=0.27) and oral analgesics (P=0.37) also suggested no difference. No differences were found in duration of the operation, incidence of postoperative complications, time of returned bowel function, and length of the hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The VAS showed no difference in postcesarean pain between closure and nonclosure of peritoneum.

摘要

目的

比较中线切口且既往有一次剖宫产史的女性剖宫产术后腹膜缝合与不缝合时疼痛的强度。

研究设计

研究地点为一所大学教学医院的产科病房。对60例有中线切口且既往有一次剖宫产史、行择期再次剖宫产的孕妇进行了双盲随机试验。每组30名女性,分别被分配到“缝合”组和“不缝合”组。主要结局指标是采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估的剖宫产术后疼痛。

结果

再次剖宫产患者中,腹膜缝合组和不缝合组术后疼痛无差异;休息时(P = 0.8)、在床上活动时(P = 0.94)以及行走时(P = 0.52)均无差异。阿片类药物的使用(P = 0.27)和口服镇痛药的使用(P = 0.37)也无差异。手术时间、术后并发症发生率、肠道功能恢复时间及住院时间均无差异。

结论

VAS显示剖宫产术后腹膜缝合与不缝合时疼痛无差异。

相似文献

1
A randomized comparison of postcesarean pain between closure and nonclosure of peritoneum.剖宫产术后腹膜缝合与不缝合在疼痛方面的随机对照比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Feb 10;101(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00503-6.
2
Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.剖宫产时关腹与不关腹对粘连的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):56.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
3
Nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial.剖宫产术中脏腹膜与壁腹膜未闭合:一项随机对照试验
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Jul;103(7):690-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09839.x.
4
Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study.剖宫产术中腹膜关闭与不关闭对疼痛的影响——一项随机研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Aug;77(7):741-5.
5
Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中脏腹膜的缝合或不缝合。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;174(4):1366-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70686-5.
6
Effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: does it have any effect on postoperative vital signs? A prospective randomized study.剖宫产术中脏腹膜与壁腹膜缝合与否的影响:对术后生命体征有何影响?一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Apr;30(8):922-926. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1190826. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
7
Closure or nonclosure of the peritoneum at gynecological operations. Effect on postoperative pain.妇科手术中腹膜的缝合与否。对术后疼痛的影响。
Saudi Med J. 2005 Jun;26(6):964-8.
8
Nonclosure of the peritoneum during caesarean section: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.剖宫产术中不缝合腹膜:一项随机对照试验的长期随访
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 May 1;108(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00366-4.
9
[Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections].剖宫产术中腹膜未关闭。再次剖宫产的结果
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001 Jun 15;113(11-12):451-3.
10
Parietal peritoneal closure and persistent postcesarean pain.壁腹膜缝合与剖宫产术后持续性疼痛
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Feb;104(2):135-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Management of Adhesions Developed after Peritoneal Nonclosure in Primary Cesarean Section Delivery.腹腔镜处理初次剖宫产术中腹膜未关闭后形成的粘连
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018 Feb 1;2018:6901764. doi: 10.1155/2018/6901764. eCollection 2018.
2
Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.剖宫产术中腹膜关闭与不关闭的短期和长期结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 11;2014(8):CD000163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000163.pub2.